Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Ecuador Admits That It Has Restricted Internet Access For Julian Assange To Prevent Wikileaks From Intefering In The U.S. Election



Reuters: Ecuador acknowledges limiting Julian Assange's web access

Ecuador's government acknowledged on Tuesday it had partly restricted internet access for Julian Assange, the founder of anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks who has lived in the South American country's London embassy since mid-2012.

WikiLeaks said Assange lost connectivity on Sunday, sparking speculation Ecuador might have been pressured by the United States due to the group's publication of hacked material linked to U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

In a statement, Ecuador's leftist government said WikiLeaks' decision to publish documents impacting the U.S. election campaign was entirely its own responsibility, and the South American country did not cede to pressure from other nations.

"In that respect, Ecuador, exercising its sovereign right, has temporarily restricted access to part of its communications systems in its UK Embassy," it added in a statement.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: This is just more proof that the leaks that Wikileaks is posting is having a huge impact on the Democrat Party.

More News On Ecuador Admitting That It Has Restricted Internet Access For Julian Assange To Prevent Wikileaks From Intefering In The U.S. Election

Ecuador cuts off Internet access for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange -- Washington Post
Ecuador Cuts Internet of Julian Assange, WikiLeaks’ Founder -- NYT
Ecuador takes responsibility for cutting internet to Assange -- CNN
Ecuador: We Have 'Temporarily Restricted' Assange's Internet -- AP
Ecuador says it cut WikiLeaks founder's internet over US election interference -- The Guardian
Ecuador says it has 'temporarily restricted' WikiLeaks founder Assange's internet access -- FOX News
WikiLeaks: Ecuador admits limiting Assange's internet access -- BBC
WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange’s Isolation Deepens -- WSJ

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

No, is not having impact at all (take a look at the polls...). They just don't want him to interfere.

Unknown said...

Anonymous is right.

And the group Anonymous seem like a bunch of pansies.

They have not come out and said that they would uncover the truth.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(group)