Thursday, October 12, 2017

Did North Korea Just Conduct A Nuclear Test?


The United States Geological Survey explained: 'This event occurred in the area of the previous North Korean Nuclear tests. 'The event has earthquake like characteristics, however, we cannot conclusively confirm at this time the nature (natural or human-made) of the event'

Daily Mail: Has Kim Jong-Un tested another nuclear bomb? Magnitude 2.9 earthquake is detected near North Korean test site

* Small earthquake detected in North Korea near where nuclear tests conducted
* US Geological Survey said 2.9 magnitude quake recorded near Sungjibaegam
* It explained the event occurred in the area of the previous regime nuclear tests

A small earthquake has been detected in North Korea in the same part of the country where previous nuclear tests were conducted.

The United States Geological Survey said the 2.9 magnitude earthquake was recorded 14 miles northeast of Sungjibaegam.

It explained: 'This event occurred in the area of the previous North Korean Nuclear tests.

'The event has earthquake like characteristics, however, we cannot conclusively confirm at this time the nature (natural or human-made) of the event.'

Read more ....

WNU Editor: If these reports are true .... a 2.9 magnitude is very small explosion .... or an aftershock from a previous quake.

More News On Concerns That North Korea Just Conducted A Nuclear Test

Small quake rattles North Korea nuclear testing grounds, not manmade: South Korea -- Reuters
Small quake registered in area of North Korea where previous nuclear tests occurred -- USA Today
North Korea: Earthquake near nuclear site sparks fears of fresh hydrogen bomb test -- The Independent
Small Earthquake Detected in North Korea In Same Location as Prior Nuke Tests -- Epoch Times
North Korea earthquake sparks fears of new nuclear test -- Evening Standard
Earthquake Rattles North Korea, Speculation Country Tested Another Nuke Weapon -- Sputnik

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well,hard to know. It might have been a test gone wrong. For example, if it indeed was a hydrogen bomb test, the yield could have been very small - unlikely, looking at the yields of all previous hydrogen bomb tests by eg the US,Russia and France...but still possible.
More likely however, is that if it indeed was a hydrogen bomb test, that only the first part of the bomb, the fission part, exploded, and the second did not. Hence why it could be a test, albeit an "unsuccessful"one (there are nounsuccessful tests, they are tests after all)
It could also be that simple TNT was used to just make more underground test sites/they need to build these after all and TNT might have triggered a collapse of a cavern or a landslide. Either way..sniffers should be able to tell us more in a couple of days

Bob Huntley said...

Could it be a miniaturized bomb?

Anonymous said...

what's with the X axis of that graph? "Average time between tweets".. a prank by the creator? lol

jimbrown said...

Did we nuke them? Make their their test range impossible to use?