Tuesday, January 30, 2018

China Testing South Korea's Air Defense Zone

(Click on Image to Enlarge)

SCMP: South Korea accuses Chinese military plane of entering air defence zone without permission, report says

Fighter jet scrambled to monitor unidentified flight to southwest of Ieo Island, Yonhap cites military officials as saying.

South Korea accused China of flying a military aircraft into its air defence identification zone on Monday without giving prior notification.

“Our military first detected the unidentified flight in the southwest of Ieo Island,” its Joint Chiefs of Staff was quoted as saying in a report by the Yonhap news agency.

The defence authority was cited as saying that the aircraft entered South Korea’s Air Defence Identification Zone (KADIZ) about 9:30am, before moving into Japan’s air identification zone and finally flying out of the South Korean zone about 2:05pm.

It did not provide a precise timeline for the aircraft’s movements.

The report came after five Chinese military aircraft entered the KADIZ on December 18, prompting Seoul to describe the move as an infringement. China’s air force said at the time that the aircraft had been taking part in a routine operation after a long-range exercise into the Sea of Japan.

Read more ....

Update #1: Chinese Military Plane Buzzes Korea's Air Identification Zone (Chosun Ilbo)
Update #2: Chinese aircraft trespasses South Korea, Japan airspace (UPI)

WNU Editor: After the Winter Olympics are over in South Korea .... expect more of these Chinese aircraft incursions.

2 comments:

Carl said...

Except that and ADIZ is not internationally recognized sovereign airspace. An ADIZ is simply airspace that a country has declared that it will control for its own security purposes. There's no international agreements that say that an ADIZ has to be respected. The US doesn't respect or recognize the ADIZ that China declared over the East China Sea in 2013. In fact, in that area, ADIZ's overlap which actually creates the conditions for an incident to occur.

Kungflu said...

Carl your response should be directed to the writer of this article.