A News Aggregator That Covers The World's Major Wars And Conflicts. Military, Political, And Intelligence News Are Also Covered. Occasionally We Will Have Our Own Opinions Or Observations To Make.
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Why Conventionally Armed ICBMs Are A Dangerous Development
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has made an startling revelation today: The US has long-range missiles armed with high-power-but-non-nuclear explosives ready for a global strike. The (big) problem: China and Russia won't be able to distinguish between nuclear and non-nuclear ICBMs.
This is what Gates said, talking on NBC's Meet the Press:
We have, in addition to the nuclear deterrent today, a couple of things we didn't have in the Soviet days… And we have prompt global strike affording us some conventional alternatives on long-range missiles that we didn't have before.
Read more ....
My Comment: I made the same observation a week ago .... both Russia and China do not have the capability to ascertain the difference between a nuclear armed ICBM or a non-nuclear one.
As far as they are concerned .... an ICBM is an ICBM, and if launched it would probably be armed with a nuclear warhead. How they would react after such a launch is anyone's guess.

Even worse, it was on this basis Gates said the new Nuclear Policy Review was based. I had supported the new policy, but I don't now!
ReplyDeleteArmchair Generalist had a good post on this a few months back. Read esp. the comment by James.
http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/02/why-do-we-need-prompt-global-strike.html
Thanks T. Greer for your comment.
ReplyDeleteAnd you are right, Armchair Generalist does have a good post on this subject. I read him regularly, but this is something that I guess I had forgotten.