Critics Dispute The New York Times Report That Al Qaeda Was Not Involved In Last Year's Deadly Benghazi Attack

Congress, In Bipartisan Tone, Disputes Report Al Qaeda Not Involved In Deadly Benghazi Attack -- FOX News

House lawmakers on Sunday disputed a new report that concludes Al Qaeda played no role in the fatal 2012 terror attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya.

The report, published Saturday in The New York Times, found no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had a role in the assault that killed four Americans on Sept. 11, 2012, and stated the attack appeared largely fueled by anger over an American-made anti-Islamic video, as the Obama administration first claimed.

“I dispute that, and the intelligence community, to a large volume, disputes that,” Michigan GOP Rep. Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told “Fox News Sunday.”

He also repeatedly said the story was “not accurate.”

Rogers was joined on the show by California Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, who said, “intelligence indicates Al Qaeda was involved.”

Read more ....

Previous Post: The New York Times Fails In Their Benghazi Investigation

More News On Critics Disputing The New York Times Report That Al Qaeda Was Not Involved In Last Year's Deadly Benghazi Attack

Yes, There IS Evidence Linking al Qaeda to Benghazi -- Eli Lake, The Daily Beast
'Completely false': Sources on ground in Benghazi challenge NYT report -- FOX News
Lawmakers still see al-Qaida as players in Benghazi attack -- UPI
Rogers Contradicts NYT Report On Benghazi -- RTT
Lawmakers push back on New York Times Benghazi report -- MSNBC
GOP disputes NYT report that al Qaeda not involved in Benghazi attacks -- CBS
The New York Times whitewashes Benghazi -- Thomas Joscelyn, Threat Matrix
Times Ignores Evidence of Al Qaeda Link to Benghazi -- Weekly Standard
New York Times under fire for 'propaganda' claiming video caused Benghazi attack -- Examiner