WNU Editor: The website Most Damaging Wikileaks has made a list that they believe is the Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks (so far). I am glad that someone has taken the time to do this ... it is long overdue. As to who has put this together .... I do not know, but it is clearly someone who is not a fan of the current situation. As to what I do believe is the most damaging of the leaks .... ignoring the many "pay to play" emails .... is finding out how close the collusion is between the mainstream media and the Clinton campaign. I know that ideologically many of these reporters are in sync with the Clintons, but to actively work with them to plant stories and provide a narrative to the news of the day is disturbing to say the least. The leak that is the most surprising to me is Hillary Clinton's support for fracking (list #29). She is correct .... this technological development has proven to be a Godsend for the U.S. and energy independence from OPEC.
I'd like to see what kind of anti-constitution hate-vomit Trump spews in his emails.
ReplyDeleteDeflect much? Are two horrible candidates better than one?
ReplyDeleteBreaking- the FBI are opening a new investigation of Clinton E-Mails just announced. Apparently they found a bunch more E-Mails. Not good for her campaign at this late date. Can't wait to see the spin they put on this.
ReplyDeleteTWN,
ReplyDeleteVery respectfully, nothing will come of this. With that said ultimately she will go to prison or her health issues will kill her long before she finishes her first term assuming she gets elected. Ultimately what does her in will be something petty, think O. J. Simpson.
WNU,
I skimmed the site you mentioned and will view more closely when I have the opportunity. With regards to point 29 she is spot on. If we fully exploited this, the United States could literally become the go to country in the world for oil. The United States could possibly even become the most powerful and influential country on earth.
With this said her public opposition to fracking is probably closer to where she really stands. If elected, expect her to declare all out war on fracking, the industry, and those engaged in it. As for the speeches to Goldman Sachs, this is what those paying her wanted to hear. In short, she lied to them. If HRC is elected, Goldman Sachs should expect to receive a proverbial knife the spine from her and her team. Goldman Sachs and others should understand the trouble with blackmailers such as HRC is they never have enough and they eventually end up killing you anyway!!
The intro on their site was interesting. I do remember when Wikileaks was going after the Bush Administration and were being praised by the media and the Democrats as heroic. Now they are "Russian agents."
Perhaps this is correct. If they are, then the Russians almost certainly have all of the emails she thinks she deleted or there is a good chance they do. As such, Russia would essentially own her. So assuming Wikileaks is a part of the Russian government, allied with them, or working with Russia this would be all the more reason not to elect HRC under any circumstances.
This is NOT a defense of HRC but part of the "base" of her party consists of radical environmentalists, I would call them envirowhackos. As such, HRX or anyone else wishing to advance in the Democratic party will need to publically appeal to them. With that said the public position in opposition to fracking is probably her real position and what she told the audience who paid her was what that audience wanted to hear.
ReplyDeleteWe really do not "know" for certain what her position really is. This does create a problem.
Yeah we do, both she and Obama gave a "nothingburger" to the DAPL protestors who are being brutalized by militarized Police and PSC's, trying to protect the drinking water for 28 million Americans, because it's fracked Bakken Shale Oil.
DeleteLMAO, oil in your water, suck it up, Buttercup, lead in your pipes, no biggie, Calcium EDTA is only up 2,700% to $26,927 a treatment.
LMAO.
Bposter watches Russian propaganda while he flicks his clam
ReplyDeleteNick,
ReplyDeletePerhaps you shoukd try reading the posts in their entirety before commenting. If you did, you'd know I'm not pro Russian. I'm pro American. As such, I push for policies that are most likely to advance American intersts.
For example, the Russians likely have Hillary's missing emails assuming WikiLeaks is a Russian agent and, if they're not, the Russians more than likely hacked into HRC's email. As such, foreign agents like Russia will likely own HRC as they will be able to expose more emails at a time and place of their choosing to undermine her.
Also, the Russians are most likely to oppose fracking which puts them in agreement with HRC. Goldman Sachs paid a large sum to get their ears tickled. In other words, she lied to them to get their money to advance anti fracking policies, as is most likely.
It's best not to have as POTUS a clearly compromised pedson such as this. While it is best to try and dxamine things from many sources, this has nothing to do witb Russuan messaging (propaganda). As for the last part, very respectfully discuss the issues seriously or don't waste time.
Wikileaks prove one thing:
ReplyDeleteHillary is a scummy politician who has violated rules, laws, public trust and pushes the agenda of the rich. She can not be trusted to do anything but same 'ol same 'ol.
So what else is new?
She fits right in with her peers and predecessors.
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/10/27/the-modern-history-of-rigged-us-elections/