Sarah Knuckey, Ole Solvang, Jonathan Horowitz and Radhya Almutawakel, Just Security: Pentagon Admits Major Investigation Flaw: They Rarely Talk to Air Strike Witnesses or Victims
In a transcript of a Pentagon Press Briefing, released this week by Airwars, Central Command’s Deputy Director for Operations made a striking admission about U.S. investigations into civilian casualties in Syria:
Q: Okay. So, you didn’t talk to anybody on the ground and nobody visited the site. Is that — that correct, right?
GEN. BONTRAGER: That is correct, Bill, and that’s common. It’s a rare thing with strikes like this that we can get on the ground in person, or that we can talk to anybody on the ground is not uncommon at all.
The admission was made as Bontrager described his investigation into the March 16, 2017 al-Jinah strike, a U.S. strike that human rights NGOs say may have killed up to 38 civilians praying at a mosque. Bontrager concluded, in contrast, that only one civilian “likely” died.
Human rights groups have long voiced concerns about the inadequacy of U.S. investigations into the consequences of U.S. strikes in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, and elsewhere, but it is rare to see such an open and general acknowledgement from the Pentagon that its investigators rarely conduct site visits or speak with witnesses and other people on the ground.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: One more reason why we should always be sceptical when the Pentagon (and other countries for that matter) declare low civilian casualty numbers.
It is a war zone.
ReplyDeleteIs 10%, 20%, 50% or 70% losses of investigators acceptable?
Just asking.
Lets assume the civilians of the area do nothing to the investigators.
What about al Qaeda and other actors?
After all Al Qaeda murdered Daniel Pearl and for what?
Mr. Pearl had no guns and would turn over no information over to the U.S. government.