Kay Bailey Hutchison said: ‘We would then be looking at a capability to take out a missile that could his any of our countries in Europe and hit America in Alaska.’ Photograph: Francois Lenoir/Reuters
The Guardian: US Nato envoy's threat to Russia: stop developing missile or we'll 'take it out'
* Kay Bailey Hutchison seems to raise prospect of strike
* Washington says cruise missile breaks 1987 INF treaty
The US ambassador to Nato has warned Russia that if it does not halt the development of a new cruise missile in violation of a treaty between the countries, the US will “take out” the missile.
Kay Bailey Hutchison was speaking to reporters about a longstanding issue of contention, a Russian ground-launched cruise missile which Washington says breaks the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF).
Read more ....
WNU editor: This is very dangerous talk.
More News On U.S. Ambassador To NATO Kay Bailey Hutchison Has Warned Russia To Stop Developing Banned Missile Or We'll 'Take It Out'
U.S. would destroy banned Russian warheads if necessary: NATO envoy -- Reuters
US NATO Envoy Warns Russia to Halt New Missile Development -- VOA/AP
U.S. Could 'Take Out' Controversial Russian Weapon If Necessary, Envoy Says -- RFE
US threatens to 'take out' Russian missiles if Moscow keeps violating nuclear treaty -- CNN
US NATO envoy warns Russia against developing new missiles -- The Hill
US ambassador to NATO threatens to 'take out' Russian cruise missile -- Washington Examiner
'They are on notice': Trump's NATO envoy warns Russia that U.S. could 'take out' new missile system -- Ottawa Citizen/AP/National Post
US Threatens to Destroy Russian Warheads if Necessary - Envoy to NATO -- Sputnik
‘We’d take out Russia’s nukes,’ US NATO envoy says, claiming ‘banned’ missiles are being developed -- RT
But but Trump is Putin puppet, I don't understand. ..Fred assured us!
ReplyDeleteYes. Fred said so. Trump also did away with this and that on climate change but his govt still sees it as real and a threat, as does the Pentagon.
ReplyDeleteand yes, our navy got hassled by China and Trump did nada and now another threat from a former Senator to NATO, an outfit Trump scorns...but threat threat threat...call me names when action follows Iranian-like threats.
The Press lies yet again.
ReplyDeleteKay Baily said that NATO would develop the CAPABILITY to take it out".
Big difference from saying "take it out".
Common man, every military wants CAPABILITY to take out adversary's weapons.
B would like to take her out, and launch a premptive missile strike of his own 😁👌
DeleteShe is obviously talking about the u.s walking away from the treaty and developing a counter weapon capable of taking it out in war.
ReplyDeleteNot a pre emptive strike!!
U.S. Could 'Take Out' Controversial Russian Weapon If Necessary, Envoy Says
ReplyDeleteU.S. would destroy banned Russian warheads if necessary: NATO envoy
‘We’d take out Russia’s nukes,’ US NATO envoy says, claiming ‘banned’ missiles are being developed
THAT (ABOVE) IS WHAT GOT SAID ...NOT DEVELOP CAPABILITY
In order to take out the alleged weapn systems the US would need to develop the capability or, at the very least would need to be sure it has such capability. Given the unreliability of the people making the claim, this hardly inspires confidence. This looks like more wild and reckless statements on the part of our government officials .
ReplyDeleteWell spoken, comrade
ReplyDeleteLet's sing song about beautiful mother Russia later and dance funny dance,da?