US President Trump and China's Xi agree to suspend any new tariffs in the escalating trade war between the world's two largest economies, even if huge existing duties remain in place https://t.co/4F1g9eTiyY pic.twitter.com/v8N5GtNSTN
— AFP news agency (@AFP) December 2, 2018
Trump says next meeting with North Korea's Kim likely in early 2019 https://t.co/LGRmFbvSAP pic.twitter.com/RDLCLZuZYy
— Reuters Top News (@Reuters) December 2, 2018
#SecDef Mattis honored former commander-in-chief President George H.W. Bush Saturday at the @ReaganDefense Forum. Statesman, public servant, diplomat, and #WWII pilot, he led a remarkable life dedicated to service and defending our freedoms.#RNDF #Bush41 pic.twitter.com/z9nlzzlbf2
— U.S. Dept of Defense (@DeptofDefense) December 2, 2018
Satellite images show China is continuing to build facilities on islands and reefs in the South China Sea. What can countries like the Philippines and Vietnam do to stop it?
— Nikkei Asian Review (@NAR) June 15, 2018
Guardian has not pushed its fake “Manafort held secret meetings with Assange” story since being published Tuesday. This is surely because it knows it is fabricated. This is serious. Are no Guardian journalists raising alarm bells? Your paper is *fabricating stories*. https://t.co/OHEeG1FFUl
— Mark Curtis (@markcurtis30) December 1, 2018
I, for one, welcome our owl overlords pic.twitter.com/p5Cw17czDr
— Daniel Rourke 📉 (@therourke) December 1, 2018
"Guardian has not pushed its fake “Manafort held secret meetings with Assange” story since being published Tuesday. This is surely because it knows it is fabricated. This is serious. Are no Guardian journalists raising alarm bells? Your paper is *fabricating stories*."
ReplyDelete- Mark Curtis
Reason?
Because now the press has "Moved On" to fabricating stories about Cohen.
Cohen is the type of lawyer, who is a fixer. He fixes one night stands for rich men. With 2/3rd of men cheating on their marriages during their marriage, America is not one to throw stones in a glass house.
So do I f*cking care?
No!
Especially, since the Democrat party and many Democrat voters went to the mat for serial rapist and sexual assaulter Bill Clinton. Only since about 2015 or there after have a few of the herd strayed from party orthodoxy and have said that maybe they should not have defended bill Clinton's illegal sex life, since he is no longer president and his wife cannot win high office.
Democrats have studiously made sure that Senator Menendez and Bill Clinton are protected from investigations into their pedophilia.
calm down. you have a pussy grabbing hero president who has still a number of cases in the courts...try being less partisan.
ReplyDeleteCohen was very close for a long time to Trump and now flipped, he will do a lot more than you suggest.
ReplyDeleteMichael Cohen plea signals 'blockbuster indictment,' says Watergate prosecutor
The guilty plea by the president's former fixer looks like a building block for additional indictments of those in Donald Trump's orbit. What's next? Many more are going to jail, a Watergate prosecutor told DW.
MUELLER IS NO SLOUCH AT HIS JOB
ReplyDeleteClaims and counterclaims fly around Guardian Manafort–Assange scoop
ReplyDeleteBob Mueller is a slouch at honest investigating.
ReplyDeleteAs a Spanish Inquisitor Bob Mueller is no slouch.
When Comey and Mueller Bungled the Anthrax Case
When you appoint a lawyer as a special counsel it is helpful to know their track record.
Thus Meuller's track records is germane.
The anthrax case shows Mueller to not be capable of sound reasoning.
You absolutely will not read the article. So, let me spell this out for you.
1) Hatfill was a virologist.
2) That means he studied viruses.
3) Anthrax is a bacteria.
4) Hatfill had no access to anthrax.
4) Ivins had access to anthrax and had patents.
5) Ivins also had a modus operandi of threatening people.
So Ivins had method motive and opportunity.
Hatfill did not have method, motive or opportunity.
So who did Meuller attack for 5 years like a mangy, slavering dig?
Hatfill.
Of course that makes sense to your diseased brain.
I am glad I could connect the dots for you, but you still will not see the light. You are that dumb.
"Claims and counterclaims fly around Guardian Manafort–Assange scoop"
ReplyDeleteLooks like Fred is going to swirl down bowl with the Guardian gibbering about a scoop.
Bernie Sanders' Wife Won't Face Charges for Bank Fraud
ReplyDeleteThere is two sets of justice in America.
Republicans face 40 year old ginned up accusations.
Democrats can abuse women. There can be pictures of the bruises and the Democrat becomes the head of law enforcement for the state.
Democrat voters are too stupid to see what tribal people they are. So Bernie Sanders has 2 or 3 homes and his wife bankrupts a college, but all is okay. Good socialist dweebs will still vote for Bernie and feel the burn.
pounce on fred! morons: i posted a piece that offers both sides to the story but of course you need to vent so badmouth fred. says more about you than anyone else
ReplyDeleteThat is not what you did Fred.
ReplyDeleteThe Guardian did what all 'good' newspapers do when they run a bad story. They and other papers pretend it doesn't exist for the most part.
The posting is about claims and counter claims to make it look like you are claiming the high ground, but really you are just popping smoke and laying a smoke screen as you beat a hasty retreat.
Whatever lets you sleep at night.
sorry anon but I had posted a piece that raised all the issues on both sides of the Guardian article. If you can not understand that, well that is your problem and not mine
ReplyDeleteThe article was a mea culpa for The Guardian and all journalists
ReplyDelete'It says "My Bad, nor harm down let's move on."
“Finley’s” article should be taken with a mountain of salt (if taken at all).
Why do they say that in paragraph 5 of 6?
They should tell it like it is. The Guardian is shit. It has no checks and balances.
stay with Fox, where all truth comes from
ReplyDeleteget over it...we do not know as of this hour if the Guardian article is a huge mistake or if it is valid and for those who think they have the truth, well you have no basis for saying so other than your biases!
I do not have cable.
ReplyDeleteI do not watch Fox.
You want to try that little shibboleth again?
Also young Lapides, Fox has changed with the changing of the guard from the father to the children.
Further Fox was always fair and balanced. Shep Smith and Bret Baier do not pull any punches due to being conservative. You may have heard (then you may have not as you are slow) Shep is quite liberal.
What is conservative are the the pundits that come on in the evening after the news hour.
I guess after the straight up news is read, you seem to want know pundits who are conservative any voice at all. There are oodles and oodles of liberal pundits on 5 other networks. But somehow you seem aggravated, worked up, and frightened of just 1 of 6 networks have conservative pundits. That says a lot about you and your so called Democratic and Republican values or lack there of.