Sunday, September 29, 2019

Congress Has Reached An Agreement For Trump-Ukraine Whistleblower To Testify



CNBC: House intel committee has reached an agreement for Trump-Ukraine whistleblower to testify ‘very soon,’ Schiff says

* House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said the exact timing of the testimony depends on when the director of National Intelligence completes the security clearance process for the whistleblower’s lawyers.
* He said the inquiry will focus on “the fundamental breach of the president’s oath of office.”
* President Trump, in a flurry of posts on Twitter over the weekend, slammed the impeachment inquiry as a “scam” and a “witch hunt” and called on Schiff to resign.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that an agreement has been reached for the whistleblower at the center of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump to testify before Congress.

In an interview on ABC’s “This Week,” Schiff, D-Calif., said he expects the whistleblower to testify “very soon,” but timing depends on when the director of National Intelligence completes the security clearance process for the individual’s lawyers.

“We’ll get the unfiltered testimony of that whistleblower,” Schiff said.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: I completely fail to see how can you get anything meaningful from someone who says he heard something from someone who had heard it from another source. All that this CIA official can do when he testifies (which I predict will be completely behind closed doors), is a list of the people that he heard this information from. With this list the Congress can then call in these people to testify and to get from them a list of the individuals that they heard this information from. And with this final list, call in these individuals on what they heard who in the end will probably only verify that the transcript the White House released to the public on Wednesday is true. Is it me, or am I the only one who sees how screwed up this is all going to become.

4 comments:

  1. Three points:

    1.) Someone changed the whistle blower regs to allow hearsay.
    a.) They need to stand trial.
    b.) They need to be known to all citizens.

    2.) Will the Republican party have report an in kind contribution that the Democrats and RINOs are making to the Republican get out the vote?


    3.) The Democrats will not stop. They have been ratcheting up the dirty tricks fro decades with very little blowback. They have been conditioned to expect they can do anything and get away with it. They have to be totally defeats.


    "** The Deep State changed the requirements for filling out the whistleblower form and in August allowed whistleblowers to use ‘hearsay’ when filing a complaint. At this same time the whistleblower filled out the form slandering President Trump using hearsay. (1-6)"

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/revealed-deep-state-intel-community-and-congress-colluded-whistleblower-documents-also-altered-by-crs-to-fit-partisan-cia-accuser-of-trump/

    ReplyDelete
  2. It looks as if the Democrats are using this item to expedite their move towards the impeachment hearing with the plan of attaching numerous other impeachable incidents to the action and are currently hurrying to backfill the articles of impeachment to be added.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lucky for America your not staffing a Constitutional inquiry on the Hill. There we have people trained and experienced who do understand the law. I guess immigrant Canadians are not taught about rule of law and the meaning of a Constitution.

    ReplyDelete
  4. When I was growing up the gouge was that criminals and other on the run would walk graveyards and look for newborns that had died with in a few days of birth. They would then file documents and assume their legal Identities.

    I wonder in the internet age, if trolls freelance and form several counties look for people in old folks homes and assume their online identities to give weight to their trolling. We have septuagenarians and octogenerians that are down for the count no matter how ridiculous the cause.


    ReplyDelete