Thursday, October 31, 2019

The Identity Of The Anonymous 'Whistleblower' Who Triggered Impeachment Proceedings Against President Trump Is Suspected To Be A Well Known Democrat Activist


Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations: The Beltway's 'Whistleblower' Furor Obsesses Over One Name

For a town that leaks like a sieve, Washington has done an astonishingly effective job keeping from the American public the name of the anonymous “whistleblower" who triggered impeachment proceedings against President Trump — even though his identity is an open secret inside the Beltway.

More than two months after the official filed his complaint, pretty much all that’s known publicly about him is that he is a CIA analyst who at one point was detailed to the White House and is now back working at the CIA.

But the name of a government official fitting that description — Eric Ciaramella — has been raised privately in impeachment depositions, according to officials with direct knowledge of the proceedings, as well as in at least one open hearing held by a House committee not involved in the impeachment inquiry. Fearing their anonymous witness could be exposed, Democrats this week blocked Republicans from asking more questions about him and intend to redact his name from all deposition transcripts.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: If this report is true, this person should not be working in the CIA or in any other government position where a security clearance is required. I can also understand why House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff does not want the identity of this person (if it is Eric Ciaramella)  to be made public. This person is a partisan Democrat, who was removed from the White House over reports that he was leaking to the media. Talk about having an axe to grind with President Trump. It should also be noted that this Eric Ciaramella has some incredible Democrat contacts and ties ....

Whistleblower had 'professional' tie to 2020 Democratic candidate -- Washington Examiner
Eric Ciaramella, Schiff’s ‘whistleblower,’ has ties to Susan Rice and Joe Biden -- CDN
Anti-Trump Whistleblower Attorney Worked Directly For James Clapper -- The Federalist
Report: Anti-Trump Complainant Eric Ciaramella Worked With Brennan, Biden, and DNC Operative Chalupa -- American Greatness
at

5 comments:

  1. AnonymousOctober 31, 2019 at 11:15 PM

    Look, this is just a show and it's made to look ridiculous with whistle blowers like this so that Trump will win. Even the Russia collusion was so ridiculous that out of the many readers of your blog only 2-3 were braindead and indoctrinated enough (cnn) to believe any of this. Trump will win by such a large margin that not only the economy will rock with a hard on (thanks to the trade deal which the Chinese have to make), but it will almost end political correctness - with Trump 4 mir years in office this is the Best thing of all. Finely being able to speak your mind, not bring told you are a racist for having a different perspective (and finally all those assholes who got away with this filthy degrading shit will see the tables flipped around. Calling half the country racist. Wtf is wrong with them..once this shit of race card and sex card playing ends all these people working in HR overburdening everyone's lives with their near fascism will also have less power)..good times!

    Bad times - very bad times - if Trump gets assassinated. So many people and nations want him gone

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousOctober 31, 2019 at 11:19 PM

    The parrot is not brain dead. 'Me thinks' parrot never had a functional brain from before birth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. RussInSoCalNovember 1, 2019 at 2:07 AM

    It's quite apparent when the Democrat meat grinder is done with their errand boys. It was easy to predict that this particular tool would be tossed under the bus. Just a matter of when.

    Apparently this ivy league Pajama Boy's usefulness is now at an end.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousNovember 1, 2019 at 7:57 AM

    a label does not dismiss reality. the informant is swearing under oath. further, it has been made very clear that sufficient numbers of known professionals working for Trump are testifying and that this informant no longer even needed. sorry, but your process arguement went out the window a few days ago

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousNovember 1, 2019 at 8:21 AM


    1) And often a label succinctly tells people what is what. Labels must be true more often than not true or they cease being useful.

    2) Labels can be wrong.

    3 See 1 & 2 and make up your own mind. Do not be like Mr. All Bold and have your mind made up for you.

    ReplyDelete