Friday, May 1, 2020

U.S. Intelligence Agencies Says Coronavirus Is Not 'Man-Made Or Genetically Modified'





Daily Mail: Coronavirus is NOT 'man-made or genetically modified,' U.S. intelligence agencies conclude - but spies ARE probing whether it leaked from Wuhan lab by accident

* Statement from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence rules out conspiracy theory that coronavirus was man-made
* It says U.S. spy agencies, collectively called the intelligence community, agree with 'wide scientific consensus that Covid-19 was not man-made'
* They also rule out genetic modification but say that they are still investigating whether it escaped from lab in Wuhan by accident
* Mike Pompeo, Donald Trump's secretary of state, has said China needs to let U.S. investigators into the Wuhan lab
* 'We know that there is the Wuhan Institute of Virology just a handful of miles away from where the wet market was,' Pompeo said two weeks ago
* Chinese government said that any claims that the coronavirus was released from a laboratory are 'unfounded and purely fabricated out of nothing'

U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that the new coronavirus was 'not manmade or genetically modified' but say they are still examining whether the origins of the pandemic trace to contact with infected animals or an accident at a Chinese lab.

The statement from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the clearinghouse for the web of U.S. spy agencies, comes as President Donald Trump and his allies have touted the as-yet-unproven theory that an infectious disease lab in Wuhan, the epicenter of the Chinese outbreak, was the source of the global pandemic that has killed more than 220,000 worldwide.

The statement was made shortly after claims surfaced in the New York Times that intelligence analysts were concerned that intelligence could be distorted to fit a pre-determined conclusion.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: President Trump disagrees .... Trump says he's seen evidence suggesting coronavirus emerged from Wuhan lab, compares WHO to PR agency (FOX News). More here .... Trump contradicts US intel community by claiming he's seen evidence coronavirus originated in Chinese lab (CNN). What's my take of this U.S. intelligence assessment. Bottom line. The U.S. intel community does not know. They made their determination solely based on what is the scientific consensus on the origins of this disease. But in the past few months I have lost count on the changing narrative of this disease. Starting with the narrative that it was not capable of transmitting from human to human, to the current narrative that it came naturally from a "wet market". As of this writing the US intel community has not given their sources of information that helped them make this assessment. I say that this reluctance to be transparent is unfortunate. Especially in view of the fact that China has not permitted any outside observers and specialists to enter China to examine the origins of this disease.

More News On U.S. Intelligence Agencies Saying The Coronavirus Is Not 'Man-Made Or Genetically Modified'

US intelligence concludes the coronavirus is not manmade, but it is studying lab accident theory -- AP
Top US spy agency says coronavirus was ‘not manmade or genetically modified’ -- CNBC
US intelligence community says it concurs with the 'wide scientific consensus' that the coronavirus was not 'man-made or genetically modified' -- Business Insider

14 comments:

  1. There are a great many catastrophically wrong assertions that begin with the statement, "Top US Intel Agency says..."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Russ,

    Nailed it!! I learned over 30 years ago that these people should not be trusted as a primary source. Perhaps they can be useful as a secondary or third source to corroborate the conclusions of a more reliable primary source.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Only believe intel when what they tell you agrees with what you want to believe
    Would you like the nation to do away with intel? And then you can tell us what is going on

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Only believe intel what they tell agrees with what you want to believe..." Examples of this would be Iraq WND even though there were warning signs this may not be the case and the attacks of 911. Leadership did not want to believe this was a threat. There's also multiple examples I'm aware of where our military personnel have died or been placed in extreme peril due to faulty intel.

      Due to both what is available in the public record and my own experiences it is my very consid opinion that these people are not trustworthy in terms of either their competence or integrity. As such, if I were in a position to decide US policy, I would not rely on US Intel as a primary source. They may be useful as a secondary or a third source that can be utilized to confirm a more reliable primary service.

      There are a number of good, competent, and honest Patriots in US Intel. Based upon my studies when about 3% of the members of an organization are incompetent or otherwise unscrupulous the entire organization is ineffective. US (un)intelligence has an incompetence level of much higher than 3% and it's even worse among the leadership.

      Possible solutions: post 911 I suggested a complete dismantling of the entire thing. After this was done we could have turned to allies like Israel, The UK, France, and Germany among others to help us with intelligence gathering and analysis as well as to help us construct competent intelligence services.

      This probably wouldn't work as well today. In the hopes of short term political gain, Democrats torched many of these alliances. The best bet would be to purge the leadership and replace them. A fish rots from the head. Hopefully the reverse is true. Before Trump lost his mind over COVID-19. As such, the best we can probably do is to try and reign in their influence. Appoint officials whi will challenge them. Keep them on their toes.

      Delete
  4. How many wise commenting people here have ever worked with US intel agencies? I have.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ 11:25,
    Well good luck. Apparently you haven't met "squirrel".

    ReplyDelete
  6. 11:25,
    You stated that you worked "with" US intel agencies, but not "in" US intel agencies, would you like to clarify that comment?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous said... How many wise commenting people here have ever worked with US intel agencies? I have.
    May 1, 2020 at 11:25 AM


    /I could tell you, but then I'd have to... you know...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Russ it's obvious who it is. Intel really Lolololo!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Russ--
    You say you wee a serviceman. I accept that. I served. I was in intel outfit. Why bother to lie to you or anyone ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Why bother" an excellent statement, then please clarify.

      Delete
  10. THen why not extrapolate in general terms?

    We civilians generally aren't privy to Itel successes, but the failures are widely public.

    ReplyDelete