Friday, November 27, 2020

President Trump Is Now Saying That He Will Only Leave The White House If Biden Can Prove His Votes Aren't Fraudulent.

Zero Hedge: Trump Now Says Biden Will Have To 'Prove' His 80 Million Votes Weren't Fraudulent Before Giving Up White House 

Update (1101ET): In a sharp reversal of earlier comments to reporters, President Trump on Friday said that he'll only leave the White House if Biden can prove the election wasn't fraudulent. 

"Biden can only enter the White House as President if he can prove that his ridiculous “80,000,000 votes” were not fraudulently or illegally obtained," tweeted Trump, adding 

"When you see what happened in Detroit, Atlanta, Philadelphia & Milwaukee, massive voter fraud, he’s got a big unsolvable problem!"


WNU Editor: It is going to be an interesting few weeks.

41 comments:

  1. On the face of it a losing proposition, on the face of it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Arizona State Legislature to Hold Public Hearing on Election Integrity on Monday, Nov. 30"

    "Sidney Powell Witness Whom NY Times Described as “Always the Smartest Person in the Room” Concludes Hundreds of Thousands of Votes Transferred from Trump to Biden IN ALL BATTLEGROUND STATES"

    Dr. Keshavarz-Nia

    "He is an experienced ethical hacker, big data architect and cloud security expert in cloud computing, Blockchain technology, and big data analytic solutions. He has led or supported the CIA, NSA, DHS US-CERT, USCYBERCOM and the FBI."

    The Despicables are going to be raining ruckus no matter the outcome. By accident or on purpose Democrats kill a mlot people. We'll have some of both in the coming months.

    Democrats will shoot you dead just for wearing a MAGA hat. It happened in Denver. More blacks are dying now because of there defund the police policies than before those policies were implemented.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Grifters gotta grift. As long as there are marks out there willing to give this clown money he won't concede.

    So he can soak the rubes for a few more weeks. Then on Jan. 20, he'll be a superfluous end table.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 4:58
    Dreaming again.

    ReplyDelete
  5. When the electors certify and Jan. 20 arrives, the former president no longer has any power. Seems simple to comprehend, 5:02.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes 5:17 I'm glad you and the Left have finally understood what Jan 20 means, you people seem to have considerable difficulty on that point.
    The Left's behavior of the last 4 yrs has not been forgotten.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have no idea what the heck you are talking about, 5:34.

    And no gives a damn about your or any other CHUD's memory. Remember it all you want, no one cares.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lolol oh you'll care alright.

      Delete
    2. If no one cares why are you commenting? Come on let's hear some more CHUDS and MAAAGA from you.

      Delete
  8. 5:44,

    YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT 5:34 MEANS. For example you act as though Trump has no power from Nov 4th through January 19th.

    You also a progressive that likes to provoke people; it is written on the wall.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In any other country the election would’ve been subject to intense scrutiny.
    But not here.
    America has built a brand based upon democracy.
    To prove democracy works, and not to resemble a third world world nation, they need to prove once and for all it was a fair result.
    Failing that America has no right whatsoever to interfere in other nations affairs. They’ll have a system no better than a failing state in Africa.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big mouth doesn't even understand how elections are done where he lives.

      Delete
  10. two dozen court cases all lost and you say no scrutiny? charges all dismissed in those cases

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not over, whether you like it or not.

      Delete
  11. Biden does not have to prove anything. The Electoral College decides and declares.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So that's finally dawned on you congratulations, took quite a while.

      Delete
  12. If no one cares why are you commenting?

    BECAUSE YOU SEEM OBTUSE AND NEED TO BE TOLD ABOUT REALITY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So it's your job to define reality. When were you appointed to this task and by whom?

      Delete
  13. Dominion said it has reported threats to law enforcement and plans to hold attorney Sidney Powell personally responsible if any of the company’s staff is harmed.

    “This criminal activity has been duly reported to the appropriate law enforcement agencies, and we intend to hold Ms. Powell, and those aiding and abetting her fraudulent actions, accountable for any harm that may occur as a result,” Dominion wrote in an unsigned statement.

    The Trump campaign distanced itself from Powell just eight days after the president praised her on Twitter. Reportedly too unhinged even for a legal team led by Rudy Giuliani—who had hair dye streaming down his face at a press conference—Powell has bandied about multiple iterations of a lawsuit challenging the now-certified results of Georgia’s presidential election. The first and seemingly very rough version was riddled with errors, starting with the caption, which twice misspelled the Northern District of Georgia as “DISTRICCT” and “DISTRCOICT.” A second and better-proofread one has been uploaded on the internet, and it remains unclear which version was filed. (Powell also filed a case in Michigan.)

    Typos were the least of the complaint’s problems, rehashing near-hallucinogenic claims somehow roping in dead Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez in an elaborate plot to tip the election in President-elect Joe Biden’s favor.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Interesting you are defending Dominion, and very interesting that you of all people are pointing to typos.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Unsigned statement, must have been written by one of those unnamed sources. You really have to do better.

    ReplyDelete
  16. it is only a matter of few strong commands from potus to ask everybody to prove that election is fair and free of fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Is 7:21 the same guy as above.

    ReplyDelete
  18. A judge can glance at a case and make some bullshit excuse for ruling against it guided by his political affiliation.

    I got mailers once a twice a week for for 2 months for a judge that was respected by everyone and was tough on criminals. I actually voted for the guy. Turns out he was a Democrat. The big politicians were behind him and he lost hugely.

    People are not putting up with it anymore. I made a mistake. I voted for a Democrat for the 2nd time in my life.

    Watch for 1 or 2 of these judges in Pennsylvania to retire or be impeached. Especially after Jan 20 as more cases get filed to look into fraud in state and local races.

    ReplyDelete
  19. "two dozen court cases all lost and you say no scrutiny? charges all dismissed in those cases"

    See above. See what the idiot wrote

    Dred Scott lost his court case. Losing a court case does not mean you are wrong. It may mean that judges are being political or immoral.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott

    ReplyDelete
  20. Fill the jail before january 20 of fraudelers. until they do things right and just.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fraudelers?
      Hahahaha

      Delete
    2. 8:15 may i correct you, fraudsters. Yeah right jail them before jan 20

      Delete
    3. 8:23 you may correct 8:06 who made the original statement. Beyond you and 8:09 who has said anything about jailing? I is always capitalized.
      You have to do better.

      Delete
  21. Is the Anon @ 6:49 a real person?

    ReplyDelete
  22. 6:49 is Fred Lapides or someone pretending to be Fred Lapides.


    Latest news is that the Pennsylvania Legislature is taking away the PA electors from Biden. They just voted on it.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Fraudelers is an actual word. It is a portmanteau of fraudster and reveler. It refers to a Democrat fraudtster, who revels in stealing elections. They party afterwards.

    ReplyDelete
  24. What Crusader said, ordinarily it would be up to team Trump to prove the allegations, however, these aren't ordinary circumstances. There seem to have been systemic irregularities that benefited the Democrat candidate. Was it enough to change the outcome of the election? In light of this Biden and his team should relish the opportunity to prove that the irregularities did not benefit them enough to alter the election or that they are a figment of team Trump's imagination. Do this and they unify the country solidly behind them.

    If it were simply a figment of team Trump's imagination, then based upon how they've behaved in the past Republican party leaders would be loudly attacking team Trump and their position. They aren't. Their criticism is only tepid. Additionally I'd expect team Biden to be laying out the evidence that these allegations are fabricated. Instead of doing this they're attacking the messengers. As this is a strategy often used by those who have a weak argument, it appears team Biden may be hoping to make this go away by attacking the messenger. Sometimes this works!!

    As for remaining in the White House, not going to happen unless team Trump can prove the fraud. I don't see the ZFBI or the military leadership allowing it unless the rank and file disobey such orders which seems unlikely. Furthermore Trump wants to run again in 2024 and there's an eye on 2022 as well as the GA Senate races. There's something else at work. Perhaps this is part of a broader negotiating strategy.

    ReplyDelete
  25. слон
    That's pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Merely translating слон does not tell you its meaning. It was not directed at the blogger at all, but he knows what it means. 4 years and still the game playing.

    ReplyDelete