Tuesday, March 2, 2021

Military And Intelligence News Briefs -- March 2, 2021

In some units, nearly three-quarters of enlistees are turning down the coveted shots- a figure that is alarming commanders given that the coronavirus pandemic continues to rage across the United States.Pictured: Military personnel preparing for the opening of a mass Covid-19 vaccination site in New York last month 


 * A third of all military personnel are refusing the COVID-19 vaccine 
 * Some are citing the rushed rollout of the anthrax vaccine in the 1990s as the reason why they do not want to receive the new COVID jab 
 * In 1997, the military made it mandatory for service personnel to receive the anthrax shot; thousands subsequently complained of debilitating side effects 
 * A lengthy legal battle ensued, before the courts determined that the FDA hadn't 'adequately studied' how effective the shot was against the inhalation anthrax 
 * Commanders concede they need to do a better job of messaging and allaying fears among military members that they are being used as 'testers' for the jab 
 * Other personnel are citing wild conspiracy theories about the vaccine, including one who refused the shot for fear it was implanting a tracking device 

A third of all military personnel are refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine, and in some units just 30% of enlistees are willing to have a shot, according to a new report. 

The figure is alarming commanders as the coronavirus pandemic continues to rage across the United States. Personnel who refuse the vaccine will face no repercussions due to a federal law that 'prohibits the mandatory application of medicines within the military that are not fully licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration', The Nation reports. 

Read more .... 

 Military And Intelligence News Briefs -- March 2, 2021 





























3 comments:

  1. It came from a food market!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I didn't realize the troops had any say in the matter.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When I was in the military shots were required. Period. Anything else was a bad conduct discharge

    ReplyDelete