FILE PHOTO: European Parliament plenary session in Brussels © Thomson Reuters
Irish Times/Financial Times: EU must adapt state aid rules in face of US green subsidies, warns commission chief
Von der Leyen lays out concerns with US Inflation Reduction Act The EU must “simplify and adapt” its rules on state aid in response to the US’s new $369 billion (€351 billion) climate package, which has soured transatlantic ties and sparked fears of a trade war between Brussels and Washington, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said on Sunday.
Europe should “adjust our own rules to make it easier for public investments”, Ms von der Leyen said, in her first set of proposals responding to a chorus of demands from EU states to mitigate and counter the US green energy subsidy scheme.
“The new assertive industrial policy of our competitors requires a structural answer,” she said in a speech focused on the trade row, which EU leaders have warned risked “fracturing” transatlantic unity.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: EU President Von der Leyen is not the only European official voicing the need for a response to President Biden's green energy subsidy plan .... US green plan should be 'wake-up call' for EU industry: French minister (France 24). More here .... Germany’s Habeck backs ‘Buy European’ response to US trade threat (Politico).
EU President Says Europe Must ‘Take Action’ Against The US $700 Billion Subsidies Package For American Businesses
EU chief says bloc must act over US subsidies plan -- DW
EU must act over distortions from US climate plan - von der Leyen -- BBC
EU to adapt state aid schemes in response to U.S. subsidy package -- Reuters
Top Republicans stay silent on Trump’s call to terminate the Constitution
ReplyDeleteSomehow a number of commenters here still believe that capturing the EU's prosperity is not the true target of the US's war aims. It appears that not even the EU puppets who directly manufactured the collapse are that blind.
ReplyDeleteYo a--F____r
ReplyDeletethe Democrat already terminated the constitution.
Mayorkas said the border was secure. Lying to cover up malfeasance or nonexecution of duties is the termination of the constitution.
Louis Lerner terminated the 1st amendment when she denied tax exempt status to conservative 401Cs but not those of liberal 401Cs,
It was illegal, Part of the proof is that Louis Lerner smashed the computers and the them in the dump so they could not be forensically investigated.
Playing by marquess of Queensbury rules (Constitution), when the other side is not is suicide.
2:32 is a loathsome PhD or Russian troll. Prove otherwise.
correction:
ReplyDeleteand then dumped them in the trash dump
If you know anything albout computers, simply smashing them does not delete contents.
ReplyDeleteDestroy Constitution? It was Trump who just said we need to get rid of our constitution and make him president...all other such accusations are silly. A law broken? sue or indict.
27 Most Embarrassing Reactions to Matt Taibbi's Hunter Biden Twitter Thread
ReplyDeleteRep. Mike Turner (Ohio), the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, on Sunday condemned former President Trump’s suggestion to suspend the Constitution over unfounded claims of mass electoral fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
ReplyDeleteDuring an appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” moderator Margaret Brennan asked Turner if he condemned Trump’s post on Saturday calling for “the termination of all rules,” including those in the Constitution, over his election claims.
“Absolutely,” Turner responded. “And I believe, answering your question, that people certainly are going to take into consideration a statement like this as they evaluate a candidate.”
5:22, 5L:45 are little bitches.
ReplyDeleteDestroying a computer is a broad statement. It does say how or what comments were destroyed. what you thought that Lerner just took a hammer to the computer and merely cracked the case? You are putting up chaff or you really are some kind of special.
During what part of the 2020 election cycle were the Democrats following the constitution?'
ReplyDeleteWhen the Democrats on the sly suspended the 1st amendment, they suspended the constitution.
An election season with a the 1st amendment suspended in so gross of a manner is not a valid election.
More simply put:
Without the 1st amendment, there is no franchise.
Democrats suspended Democracy over 3 years ago.
Trump has said he wants the Consitution ignored and that he should be installed as president. Now show me where that was not said by him. Now show me how the first amendment was destroyed by Dems and the Supreme Court ruled in favor of that.
ReplyDeleteYou sill lads make bold statements with no proof to back up what you say.
tip: independendent voters will not support a candidate who asked that the constitution be put aside.