Saturday, May 27, 2023

Senior U.S. Politician Says "Wouldn't Care" If Ukraine Used F-16s To Strike Russian Territory

Antiwar.com: Rep. Nadler ‘Wouldn’t Care’ If Ukraine Used F-16s to Strike Russian Territory 

Nadler said it was unlikely Ukraine would use F-16s to hit Russian territory despite US armored vehicles being used in Belgorod 

Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said Wednesday that he “wouldn’t care” if Ukraine used American-made F-16s to strike Russian territory despite the risk of such an attack escalating into a direct clash between the US and Russia. 

When asked by Epoch Times reporter Liam Cosgrove if he was concerned about the potential of Ukraine using F-16s to hit targets inside Russia, Nadler said, “No, I’m not concerned. I wouldn’t care if they did.”  

Read more ....  

WNU Editor: U.S. jets dropping U.S. bombs on Russia. This is what Russians would be seeing. This is not going to end well .... for both Russia AND the U.S..

21 comments:

  1. He’s a democrat. We expect stupid, reckless and reckless foreign policy thoughts from them. Nadler isn’t an outlier either. There are other in democrats circles dumber than him. Biden or Hank Johnson come to mind.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As was said above. Nadler is a Democrat, who can't even control his bowels.

    WATCH: Video of Jerry Nadler Looking Uncomfortable at Press Conference Goes Viral

    ^Pooped^ Pants


    But who gives a fuck!

    Russia can attack Ukraine on Ukrainian territory,

    but

    Ukraine cannot attack Russia on Russian territory?

    that is fucking nuts.

    Anyone who wants it to be that way is fucking nuts or a bully.

    Which one is WNU?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When you have thousands of thermonuclear weapons, you can make the rules for your own backyard as well

      Delete
  3. F16 is not needed anymore, Russians vs russian will be the next thing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "When you have thousands of thermonuclear weapons, you can make the rules for your own backyard as well"

    Ah, bully.

    Thank you for answering the question.

    I'll take the shotgun troll's answer as WNU's answer as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mexico is a good example of what can happen when you let corruption go unchecked and fester. Your borders deteriorate and your country becomes vulnerable. Ironically enough this has resulted in more deaths in the United States year over year than Russian casualties in Ukraine over the last year of war. You sir/ma’am, are a fool. Good day

      Delete
  5. ^ Former, retired bullshit artist checked-in.

    #Failed social worker
    #Failed conscript

    ReplyDelete
  6. 5Let's get back on track, shall we.

    Nadler aka "The penguin" is an idiot. He also said that ANTIFA did not exist. It was conspiracy theory and fake news.

    Sorry he is not an idiot. He is a progressive ideologue of the highest order.
    See how these people are? In another life he would have made an excellent NKVD commisar.
    Facts do not matter to these cretins. Their critical thinking skills are subordinated by thier ideology Only the ideological narrative matters.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nadler is a progressive and an ideologue. Although he is a mean, evil, sucky person does not mean he will not speak the truth on occasion.


    The Germans can attack the Maginot line, but the French attacking the Siegfried line is n escalation.

    Russia can attack Ukraine, but Ukraine attacking russia is an escalation.

    People who use that argument need to be eliminated for the betterment of mankind.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Russia attacked a helpless unarmed medical clinic

    ReplyDelete
  9. 12 57

    Invalid comparison.

    The Germans can attack the Maginot line, but the French attacking the Siegfried line is n escalation.

    Russia can attack Ukraine, but Ukraine attacking russia is an escalation.

    The ukies can attack all they want. No one is saying they cannot.

    But it is also true that the US does not have to provided them wepaons systems.
    Why don't we just give them atomic bombs. Much easier and quicker that way.

    Nadler does not care. That is the truth. He does not care if it escalates because it does not effect him. He is an ideological but case. Him , Hillary, nulland and tge rest of the neocon s a they are all for it

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am going to let 1:32's comment criticize itself.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It does not have to as it makes perfect sense. and he was right. all your comparison did was try to cloud the issue.

    ReplyDelete

  12. No, the Maginot/Siegfried lines comparisons was 100% accurate.

    ReplyDelete
  13. No, how could they be? The issue is "escalation" not "attacking"

    The ukies can attack all they want. The point of contention is should the US give them weapons to assit those attacks? The postulation is, giving the ukies the wrong weapons might widen the war and do you want to take the risk?

    Naler is saying he does not care. Does not care if the war escalates. This is the issue.

    Extremely irresponsible but perfectly predicable for an ideologue.

    Analysis:

    You need training in logical thought.

    More Off the point.....


    Good, cut to the chase. Give the ukies nukes. Hopefully jerry and his ilk will all perish in the resulting maelstrom.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Malstrøm? Really?

    I lived through the Cold War, honey. Nuclear War was always in the back of my mind, since 2nd or 3rd grade.

    Scare me with it? No.

    Piss me off and make me ant to start one? Yes.

    Keep pushing buttons fool.

    ReplyDelete
  15. DEMOCRATS BAD. that is why they won the white house and trump lost lost lost

    ReplyDelete
  16. 4:28. Guess you voted for this guy ...eh?

    ReplyDelete
  17. The guy who campaigned form his basement won and has dementia won. He did with the help of DNC ballot stuffing.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Cuban immigrants join Moscow's fighting forces in Ukraine after Putin signs bill granting citizenship

    ReplyDelete