Thursday, May 4, 2023

Was The Kremlin Drone Attack A False Flag?

 

Zero Hedge/The Automatic Earth blog: Debunking Kiev & Blinken's Latest Lie 

Russia blamed Ukraine for Tuesday night’s attempted assassination of President Putin after two drones attacked the Kremlin but were disabled by the security services before they harmed anyone. 

Kiev rejected the accusation and lied that the incident was a false flag per the innuendo pushed by Zelensky’s spokesman Nikiforov and senior advisor Podolyak. US Secretary of State Blinken echoed their claims by advising to “take anything coming out of the Kremlin with a very large shaker of salt.” 

The Kremlin’s predictably declared right to retaliate “anywhere and anytime it deems necessary” guaranteed that neither of those two would admit to any knowledge of the attack, but it wasn’t foreseen that they’d both collude in concocting a false flag conspiracy theory. Their credibility was already shattered after Russia failed to go bankrupt and subsequently collapse over the past year like they predicted, so it takes a lot of chutzpah to still lie about this attack in spite of their track record.  

Read more ....  

WNU Editor: The Western media narrative is that this was a false flag operation .... False flag? Analysts say Russia ‘likely staged’ Kremlin drone attack it blamed on Ukraine and the West (CNBC). More here .... Alleged Putin assassination is 'false flag' orchestrated to bolster Russia's war effort, experts claim (FOX News), and here .... There are big problems with the way the Kremlin drone incident went down, and war experts say Russia 'likely staged' it (Business Insider). 

As to what is my take. The Kremlin does not need a false flag to bolster Russia's war effort in Ukraine. That support is already there.

One thing that I have learned in the past few months from my family, friends, and contacts in Russia is that there is overwhelming support for the war. And after yesterday's drone attack, I do not need to be there to know that this support is only hardening.

9 comments:

  1. what about the rogue Ukrainians in the sailboat that blew up Nordstream. That was real, right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Modern day Reichstag event attempt? 🙄

    ReplyDelete
  3. Russia does not need a false flag you say. But neither does Ukraine gain much by sending a couple drones to blow up for a photo op. Somebody's lying. I say phuk'em both. Let's send a few arms shipments to Ukraine then get the hell out while we still can. But that's not what the globalists, neocons and RINOs want. If the US. ain't at war they aint happy. And there is absolutely nothing we can do about it, except maybe vote for a loudmouth egoist in 2024 to overtun the apple cart yet again.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "As to what is my take. The Kremlin does not need a false flag to bolster Russia's war effort in Ukraine. That support is already there."

    That's an incredibly layman's analysis right there. This false flag operation sets up precedents that allow the Russians to act in a way that seems justified to those who are watching, much like how Russia labelled their war 'special combat operation' or justified it because of NATO; everything they have done, they have tried to justify.

    "One thing that I have learned in the past few months from my family, friends, and contacts in Russia is that there is overwhelming support for the war. And after yesterday's drone attack, I do not need to be there to know that this support is only hardening." - One thing I learned from reading this blog as long as I have (many years), is that you yourself is at the far end of the political spectrum (far-right) and that have never been overly critical of Russia, always very careful in how you view and commentate on Russia, pre-war and post-war.

    Whenever you wish to backup an opinion, you usually 'rely' on the contacts, family and friends you have in another country. This reliance is predictable and questionable, but besides that; OF COURSE THEY SUPPORT THE WAR! To publicly say the opposite in Russia is now a crime and a prison sentence. Lucky people don't use your blog solely for the news or they would not know this, since you have not reported on the young girl whose father is facing prison and herself is facing custody by the State.

    I dare say for you to say the opposite here on this blog, puts your family and possible business interests in danger. However, the one difference here is that you believe it; you support Russia in its efforts. Most god-fearing Russians don't, but have no choice!

    I should know, all my friends and contacts over there tell me the same! ;)

    ReplyDelete
  5. It’s a false flag op, could tell watching the video two days ago. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  6. BS who will attack Kremlin without damage ?

    Hitting the answer in your head.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Of course the ukebots can confidently declare false flag in this event (only because it failed tho) whereas with Bucha, and it’s significantly greater evidence of a false flag event, it just needs to be forgotten about already, huh?

    ReplyDelete
  8. False flag.?? Not really, well who really knows.

    One thing the editor hits true on, the Russian people and press support this war. Think about it. Most of the West leaners left the country when this started.
    There really are only two real voices out there now.

    One, yes win the war .

    or two,

    Bomb the snot out of the bastards

    Not much out thier for peace. Kind of like WWii. One guy said the other day, you don't need Zelinski to have peace. Look at Hitler, he was dead and still we had peace with Germany.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No, you do not understand!!! Fazman is always right and this was a false flag, Russian attack against Russia!!!

    What to do? Why the most logical thing!!
    We send tanks, money and men to Russia and Vlad Putin to help the Russians stop all these false flags.

    It just makes things too confusing. So we have to make it unconfusing for the sake of our LGBTQ++ populations and if you look at the environmental damage of Nord stream, for the sake of reducing carbon emissions to meet 2050 goals.

    Now I think everybody can agree this fits perfectly with our progressive values!,

    ReplyDelete