* Two locations in eastern Syria linked to Iran's Revolutionary Guard were hit by airstrikes in the early hours of Friday
* The Pentagon said the strikes were in retaliation for a flurry of drone and missile attacks against U.S. bases in the region since October 17
* Washington is sending a message to Iran and its allies not to try and take advantage of the unrest in the region due to the Israel-Hamas war
Two Iranian-controlled sites in eastern Syria were hit by U.S. airstrikes in the early hours of Friday in retaliation for a flurry of attacks against U.S. bases in Syria and Iraq.
The Pentagon sent two F-16 fighter jets to attack a weapons storage facility and an ammunition plant near Abu Kamal. Both sites were run by Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, the Pentagon said.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: The US is also rushing to reinforce their bases in Syria .... Reinforcements pour into US bases in Syria as resistance attacks heat up (The Cradle).
Here is an easy prediction. This escalation of strikes is not going to stop.
US Launches Airstrikes Against Syria
US fighter jets strike Iran-linked sites in Syria in retaliation for attacks on US troops -- AP
US strikes Syria bases used by Iran-linked groups -- BBC
US strikes Iran-linked sites in Syria -- DW
US launches strikes on Iranian-linked targets in Syria following attacks on American military bases -- The Independent
U.S. strikes Iranian-backed militias in eastern Syria to retaliate for attacks on U.S. troops -- CBS
US military carries out airstrikes on facilities in Syria operated by Iranian-backed forces -- FOX News
U.S. strikes Iranian-backed ammo sites in Syria -- Politico
US strikes Syria sites used by Iran, its proxies after attacks on American troops -- Times of Israel
US attacks facilities in Syria linked to Iran, Pentagon says -- Al Jazeera
US launches airstrikes on Iran militia facilities in Syria -- Al-Monitor
US Warplanes Conduct Major Strikes On 'Iranian Proxies' In Syria -- Zero Hedge
Kirby says US strikes on Iran proxies in Syria were ‘self-defense’ -- The Hill
Why did the US launch airstrikes on Syria and what happens next? -- The Guardian
Shittus Dumbass Biden , Blinken and the other turds rolled back sanctions on Iran. now they pimp about 3.15 million barrels a day. that is a lot of money rolling in. Add to it the 6 billion and other funds unfrozen by the dumbasses and Little Jake is wondering where it all went wrong.
ReplyDeleteBiden et al are funding the enemy. No shit American troops are now getting hit.
Remind me, what is America’s strategic interest in Syria?
ReplyDelete- Defeating ISIS
ReplyDelete- Protecting the Kurds
- Being a Pain in the Ass to Assad, who fought against the US during the Iraq War.
You have been schooled Bitch!
Syrian expedition is silly. I get it, protect the Kurds and keep oil from Assad. No longer our fight. Assad has won.
ReplyDeleteIraq expedition is long over isn't it? We beat ISIS and created Hamas, why have a large US military in Iraq?
Now for Qatar, a solid ally of Iran, why do we do that?
Oil. It's long past time the US tends to its own abundant energy resources and let the Arabs tend to theirs.
I get it, protect the Kurds and keep oil from Assad. No longer our fight.
ReplyDeleteSays the Russian troll
You do not use the Kurds for the Iraq War and then abandon them.
119
ReplyDeleteKurds are being protected from the Turks, dip shit. US has no right to be in Syria. Assad did nit fight against the US during the Iraq war and in the 1st gulf war his old man was an allies of ours.
You are stupid.
Abandon them?? Idiots like you did that to the people in Basra and the Hmong in Vietnam
"US has no right to be in Syria"
ReplyDeleteyou are the type of person that needs their face pounded into the ...
Unfortunately that will never happen. you will be mobilized and most likely hit by a cluster munition to bleed out. We will have to forego small pleasures.
The Brits were in Basra. The people in Basra followed the Iranians. Now they protest the Iranians.
ReplyDeleteThere are a lot of Hmong in the US. So only partially abandoned. It is because the Hmong were abandoned by the Democrat Congress that I and others like me do not want to abandon the Kurds.
Now be a good boy and join a Z-unit
Assad did fight against the US during the Iraq war. I saw the intel. It is in the press also. and in the 1st gulf war his old man was opportunistic.
ReplyDeleteI remain unconvinced, so I guess you fail once again. I hear your boss's zipper calling you. Pucker up butter cup.
What intel did you see? Because it was bullshit. And you are lying again.
ReplyDeletethe Syrians stayed the hell out because they knew they would get hammered if they did not.
The only thing they did was to turn a blind eye to smuggling ops. They hated sadaam.
The first gulf war was not because of "opportunistic" reasons. It was because George Bush new this people and convinced them to join the coalition of the willing.
the USA has no right to be in syria. It is a war of aggression, not justified by self defence. The Kurd situation is just an excuse. the Kurds have nothing against the Syrians, it is the turks that are the problem
But go ahead and believe that nasty bitch susan power and her R2P bulshit excuse.
There is not person named susan power, you ass bitch.
ReplyDeleteGreat. yes its Sammy you drooling stick
ReplyDeleteYou did a portmanteau of Susan rice and Samantha Power. You might as well blend them as there is no diversity of thought there.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I hope your boss has you well broke in. you deserve it. you suck at your job.
You truly are a f'd up individual who has no concept of what they are saying.
ReplyDeleteBTW genius
ReplyDeleteInstead of being a dim wit
answer the questions
What intel did you see? Because it was bullshit. And you are lying again.
the Syrians stayed the hell out because they knew they would get hammered if they did not.
The only thing they did was to turn a blind eye to smuggling ops. They hated sadaam.
The first gulf war was not because of "opportunistic" reasons. It was because George Bush new this people and convinced them to join the coalition of the willing.
the USA has no right to be in syria. It is a war of aggression, not justified by self defence. The Kurd situation is just an excuse. the Kurds have nothing against the Syrians, it is the turks that are the problem
But go ahead and believe that nasty bitch susan power and her R2P bulshit excuse.
You will not be able to answer the questions because you are lying again. if you are telling the truth then answer the questions.
Syria and Iraq were both ran by the Baath Party.
ReplyDeleteWhen the Syrian dam burst, Sodom Hussein sent aid (WMDS) to Syria for safe keeping.
Try again.
Sure would like to know what intel you are talking about. I was there from 2005 to 2009
ReplyDeleteBut the real reason we are in syria and wanted the Syrian government overthrown has not been touched on.
Listen and have knowledge.
starting around 2005, Syrian and Iranian ADA systems had linkage. that means information that the Syrians picked up, Iran would be able to see in real time.
Problem?
You Bet.
If you are Israel and want to attack Iran, you want to fly over Syrian, not Jordan or Saudi air space. So That ADA linkage is a big problem. Iran would have early warning.
That is what Isis was formed and operation Timber sycamore. and the fact that syria put the kibosh on a major pipe line.
This has nothing to do with the Kurds.
Both the Israelis and the US want Assad gone. Because if Syrian still is the forward operating post of integrated Iranian and Syrian ADA, this is a huge problem for the Israelis.
423
ReplyDeleteThat turned out to be a BS story. Saddam did not have WMDs. He had them all destroyed as he stated
Water way samples said otherwise. Russian airlift said otherwise. It was Russia's greatest maskirovka. Russia needs to pay.
ReplyDeleteKill’em All
ReplyDelete457
ReplyDeleteso you are saying that Colin Luther Powell was lying? You know more than he did? He stated later that Iraq had no WMD and he was lied to by the people in the intel community about that whole situation.
so you are lying again aren't you.