Thursday, May 22, 2008

Obama's Troubling Instincts -- A Commentary

From The Wall Street Journal:

Barack Obama is ambling rather than sprinting across the primary-season finish line. It's not just his failure to connect with blue-collar Democrats. He has added to his problems with ill-informed replies on critical foreign policy questions.

On Sunday at a stop in Oregon, Sen. Obama was dismissive of the threats posed by Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba and Syria. That's the same Iran whose Quds Force is arming and training insurgents and illegal militias in Iraq to kill American soldiers; that is supporting Hezbollah and Hamas in violent attacks on Lebanon and Israel; and that is racing to develop a nuclear weapon while threatening the "annihilation" of Israel.

Read more ....

My Comment: I am of the opinion that U.S. power will become less of an influence for peace in the coming years. The reason for this is not because of American decline, but more of other countries .... Russia, China, India, Brazil, and Europe .... reasserting their traditional and historical role of being the superpower .... or at least the regional superpower.

As the rest of the world catches up to our standard of living, technological development, and economic/social status .... their sheer numbers and population size will make them the major players in their respective regions. Political and economic conflicts, bad or aggressive leaders, nationalism, religious differences and aggressive religions (Islam) .... these historical facts of life that have brought wars in the past will still be there. To keep these "forces" in check, the U.S. (as it has in the past) has and will play the moderator, the "middle man", the side that can tilt the balance in any disagreement.

For the past 60 years one of the U.S.'s strengths has been this commitment to "real politic" or what is commonly known as "political realism" .... a belief that states are primarily motivated by the desire for military and economic power or security, rather than ideals or ethics. To now have a major Presidential candidate put forward a sequence of events that will abdicate this traditional U.S. foreign policy opens a number of precedents that in turn will put into question America's traditional role in the international arena.

Will this new policy bring us peace .... or bring more war? I have yet to feel comfortable that negotiating with countries such as Iran, North Korea, and who knows who else ..... without preconditions ...... will somehow bring about peace. Karl Rove is right ..... historically ..... the best agreements that brought about peace never went down the road that Presidential candidate Obama is now suggesting.

No comments: