Saturday, January 9, 2016

Did Rules Of Engagement Prevent Fire Support For A U.S. Team Surrounded By The Taliban During A Fire-Fight This Week?

An AC-130H gunship jettisons flares as an infrared countermeasure during a training exercise on Aug. 24, 2007. JULIANNE SHOWALTER/U.S. AIR FORCE

Washington Post: Congressman questions if Army Special Forces denied rescue force, fire support

A Republican congressman who previously served as a Navy SEAL commander said Thursday that bureaucratic red tape might have delayed a rescue force and prevented close air support from adequately helping an Army Special Forces team during a firefight in southern Afghanistan this week in which one American was killed.

Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-Mont.), questioned if the rules of engagement in Afghanistan played a role in limiting the support troops on the ground received. They remain “so restrictive that when a unit is pinned down available assets are not given the latitude to respond in a timely manner and it appears in this case that it cost lives,” Zinke said in an interview.

WNU Editor: I first heard about this from the Daily Caller .... Reports: C-130 In Support Of Trapped Operators Restricted Due To Fears Of ‘Collateral Damage’ (Daily Caller). The Pentagon has been quick to respond .... CENTCOM: AC-130 'absolutely did fire' in Marjah battle against Taliban (Stars and Stripes) and AC-130 Gunship ‘Responded Quickly’ to Fatal Firefight in Afghanistan: DoD (DoD Buzz).

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Are not Obama's ROE awesome?

Was not his Warsaw workout video awesome.

James said...

Roe, Roe, Roe your boat,
gently down the stream,
Merrily, merrily, merrily,
life is but a dream.