WNU Editor: I learned about this while watching a Ukraine newscast. There is a treaty between the U.S. and Ukraine to assist each other in the investigation and prosecution of crimes. This treaty was signed in 1999. In short. President Trump was following the law when he was asking for help from the Ukraine President to investigate CrowdStrike. The treaty is here .... Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (Congress.gov).
Update: The treaty was signed by President Clinton.
Update #2: DOH! Did You Know There’s a Treaty Between the USA & Ukraine Regarding Cooperation For Prosecuting Crimes? (DC Whispers).
the president of our country investigates and handles legal matters over the phone and also using his personal lawyer, who is without security clearance? If so, then why hide what he has done and why try to prohibt the whistle blower from coming forth to show he is wrong?
ReplyDeleteBite me Pelosi😛
ReplyDeleteShred your leaders are old women that wear adult diapers hahaha 🤗
ReplyDeleteI suggest you read article 7 and 8, under the treaty given here
ReplyDeleteFred kneel before pelosi and her plastic surgery face hahaha hehehe 😋
ReplyDelete... who is without security clearance? ...
ReplyDeleteYou need a security clearance to investigate crime?
Well actually you do. My next door neighbor is a retired investigator. Before he was retired he had to be cleared for Top Secret, SCI, code word Cosmic to investigate jay walking!
;)
To investigate the Mafia you have to be cleared for code word Galaxy.
NRA Was 'Foreign Asset' To Russia Ahead of 2016, New Senate Report Finds : NPR
ReplyDeleteFox News Host Says Trump's Sons 'Stopped Doing International Business Deals' Just Before Eric Trump Tweets Scotland Deal
How a Whistle-Blower Complaint Undermined Trump - The Atlantic
The Realist Case for Impeachment
when you discuss so called legal matters and investigation etc., as editor suggests today: yes. you do need clearance and not personal lawyer
"I suggest you read article 7 and 8, under the treaty given here"
ReplyDeleteYou are alluding to shit AND YOU KNOW IT.
Some people in the Ukraine were involved in the Russian collusion hoax. So Trump is doing his duty to investigate. Just because the person involved in that collusion is running does not exempt them from scrutiny.
Former or current member(s) of MI6 and secret service of Italy were involved in the collusion.
If the fucking British intel services had unraveled the Russian collusion conspiracy at their end, then maybe the players at the American end would be out of power or in jail and could spin no more webs or rehash an old case.
So the did not want to throw Christopher Steele in the prison for his shady shit. They did not take him out so now Andrew is being taken out. Those of the wages of dithering. I believe Andrew is guilty. Depending on the statute of limitations I do not know if it is prosecutable. I also think that he did what many other swinging dick, who is a prince, OM or pol has done.
How important does MI6 think the constitutional monarch is? Is is more important than bending over and presenting their cheeks, whenever the Democrat power structure asks them to do something?
Steele knew what he did was either dangerous or shady. When it first blew up, he his for 2 to 4 weeks. I think the shady operator could still be prosecuted under British law.
The Ukrainians should learn from the British example. The might think something is dead and buried and Democrats might agree with them, but if in the future the Democrats want to reopen it for political advantage, they will do it.
Do the Ukrainians really want to be coupled with the Democrats?
Sure Ukraine is very corrupt and they want to cooperate with American law enforcement for money. They need it. But America is fast approaching their level of corruption.
So do they want to be beholden and coupled with the Democrats?
If not, then maybe they should look at the Biden nepotism in Ukraine.
Grand slam post. lol
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteFred, I think your questions have been answered on sites other than those you used for your posts today. As usual. You are too quick to pull the liberal trigger.
Your attempts at spreading the liberal slant on reality are continually undermined by the very postings you place on this site. They simply are not convincing because of the agenda of these has beens of the media universe.
As I've written before, if I want to read about gentrification in the Bronx, I'll likely use the NYT. I assume they'll get that right though with a jab at some Republican mayor two decades ago included.
But have you read anything on this site today? Do they not cast a very different light on what passes for accurate, unbiased news today in liberal minds [if they have one or a fraction thereof]?
I cannot understand how you can champion a person of the caliber of addie s..t admitting parts of his recent attempt at headline grabbing to smother what actually happened with the Ukraine situation and verified by the current president of Ukraine...do his words not move your eardrums?
Decades ago there was a family who were anti-vaxers. Their daughter paid for this parental stance and suffered from the results of the polio she thus contracted, wearing a leg brace the rest of her life. Despite this handicap, she was still chosen ahead of addie s. for one side or the other on the kickball teams at recess in the second grade. ALWAYS chosen last. Every day except when it rained. His only reprieve. Poor Adam S...t is still smarting from these daily humiliations. He couldn't adjust to being a loser and today, it still shows despite years and years of psychological intervention, being shuffled from elementary school to elementary school by his upset parents, medications that would make a Gallopogus tortoise run the quarter mile in less than a minute they were so powerful and who knows what else. A true story, I'm told, that the NYT will never acknowledge.
So Fred, it pays to know the whole story, not just the liberal one. Knowing brings enlightenment.
Your friend and fellow poster, Roger.
It is interesting that Trump did not say, "as per the agreement between our two countries" but proceeded along the lines of threat and coercion to get Ukraine's help.
ReplyDeleteHe is guilty as hell, the agreement notwithstanding. It is all about intent and he intended to get the help through bribery.
That is the criminal nature of the President of the United States of America today.
EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF TESTIMONY, COMMUNICATION, EVIDENCE SAYS THERE WAS NO BIDEN OR BIDEN SON INVOLVED IN ANYTHING ILLEGAL. I CHALLENGE YOU TO PROVE OTHERWISE!
ReplyDeleteA girl with polio was chosen over Adam Schiff?
ReplyDeleteWow that is pretty bad.
Oh look, Fred is screaming again in ALL CAPS, lol.
I remind Fredster that Hillary is innocent according to the law over her server shenanigans, but every honest person knows otherwise.
We know that Joe is guilty. He said he threatened the Ukrainian PM. We also know that his cocaine cowboy son was no more qualified to be a member of the board of Burisma than Chelsea Clinton was qualified to be a NBC reporter making $600,000 for less than a year's work.
We, the public, have to swallow one thing after another about what the children of Democrat politicians are entitled to.
For most of us it is against our will, where as for you ... you gulp.
Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch
ReplyDeleteJesus this Fred guy. Seek help man. Or start working at CNN where these grand delusions are welcome, wanted even
ReplyDeleteIf the Phone Call Was Okay, Why Was It Covered Up?
ReplyDeleteYou're insane. not even joking anymore. You have to seek help! If any of your friends or relatives read this, please help Fred Lapides. Or police or a social worker. Through your website perhaps. Someone post his public details here, so he gets some real world help
ReplyDeleteEarth to Fred, Come in Fred.
ReplyDeleteEarth to Fred, Come in Fred.
Earth to Fred, Come in Fred.
Earth to Fred, Come in Fred.
World leaders usually do not like their phone calls with other world leader publicized.
But once again we have Democrats damaging American diplomacy.
But Democrats like to Damage things.
Why not long ago tow Democrats damaged the public image of NBC.
You see these two sleaze operators, Bill & Hillary, had NBC hire their daughter for a make work job at over $ 600,0000 a year.
That just goes to show that Democrat corrupt whatever they touch.
They corrupt TV networks, Ukrainian gas companies, or just about anything under the sun.
More so they don't like people snooping around to find out how their sons or daughters got those make work jobs.
So Democrats want to publish all diplomatic correspondence, phone calls, or anything in order to put a stop into a corruption investigation into Democrats.
They will publish every diplomatic cable no matter what harm it does to the US. They will publish diplomatic cables that would have got a wikileaker thrown in jail.
The US is at war not with Democrats. It will be long and bitter.
We know why DemoShits are doing this. They cannot win any other way.
Rep Al Green gave away the game
'Rep. Al Green: "I'm Concerned If We Don't Impeach This President, He Will Get Re-Elected"'
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/05/06/al_green_im_concerned_if_we_dont_impeach_this_president_he_will_get_re-elected.html
i.e. Democrats cannot run anyone who can beat him fair and square.
Frederick R. lives out east. He is not hard to find (& not worth the trip). If you discussed his poetry with him, it might be a pleasant conversation, where you might learn something (honestly). If you discussed politics, I believe it would be like talking to a Vogon.
ReplyDeleteHe is either
- A) Dyed-in-the-wool Democrat Kool-aid drinker (entitled to his opinion)
- B) an impostor using an old man's persona
- C) not all there
- D) lonely and wants conversation even if he has to be obnoxious.
- E) a combo of A,C & D.
let me help you: If we do not stop this criminality behavior now, he might be in office for a 2nd term. That is a threat to the nation.[that is what Green is saying]
ReplyDeleteTrump Has Lost Hannity As Fox Host Privately Admits Whistleblower Allegations Are Really Bad
Today in one sentence: The White House and the Justice Department learned about the whistleblower complaint against Trump before the formal complaint was passed from the intelligence community; National Security Council attorneys directed the White House to move the Ukraine transcript to a highly classified system; the House foreign affairs, intelligence and oversight committees subpoenaed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo for documents related to Trump's interactions with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky; and two House committees requested information from the White House justifying why nearly $400 million in military aid to Ukraine was suspended.
ReplyDeleteTrump envoy met with Ukraine leader's ex-rival year before call in impeachment probe
ReplyDeleteHunter Biden's Legal, Socially Acceptable Corruption - The Atlantic
President Trump Impeachment Polls: Plurality of Americans Support Impeaching Donald Trump | National Review
What a great attempt. Not. The editor is joining the cover up. Mr. Huntley is the only one here making a good point. The DOJ takes care of these cases. This was all about getting help for the election.
ReplyDeleteTreaty. Gov to gov O.K. Gov using Lurch, no treaty in the world for that. Editor, your spin is really showing. Who is pulling your strings?????
ReplyDeleteIts the Russians...and the Ukrainians, he’s being controlled by both at the same time don’t you know!
DeleteCoverup lol sooo many Dems triggered. Just because you know you lost 2020 already. Tough shit. I deserve every bit that's coming
ReplyDeleteI disagree.
ReplyDeleteWhy would Biden sit out 2016? Because of Hillary? It was her turn? It was her turn in 2008 and Obama did not sit out.
I am not sure that his son having cancer washes either.
If I were Trump I would be asking the Italians about their part in the Russia Hoax. I would not right now, because with a liberal PM they do exactly squat. There will be a conservative Italian PM in 2 years because it is Italy and because the Italians will remember why they got rid of the open border people in the 1st place.
Trump would have got answers about Ukraine 2 years ago except that an Obama holdover Ambassador earned her pay. She protected Obama's shenanigans from being unearthed. She got removed in May. She would have been removed earlier, but the Senate Democrats did their jobs as party loyalists and slow walked all of Trump's appointments (& crowed about it).
This slow stuff. One of Flynn's associate just got his conviction vacated. Trump & others are still playing some defense. Otherwise, the whole Russia hoax thing would have been persecuted with more vigor.
I think Deuteronomy 19:19 applies. If Trump is not in jail, then it must have been a hoax. Why? Christopher Steele, Fusion GPS, the NSA, CIA, FBI, Italian Secret services, innumerable moles and leakers and they have nothing on Trump.
Flynn will go free in a year. That leads me to believe that it was a state sanction smear by Obama at some point.
If I were Trump I would be looking for all the culprits. Note that 3 or 4 people in the Italian secret services were fired.
Rep Green meant that he was popular enough with this good economy that he would get re-elected.
ReplyDeleteTrump is not doing criminal stuff like rigging primaries or hosting illegal servers, etc.
FTFY
Why do you like illegal servers?
I think it is great when American's piss on their own laws and constitution. It shows patriotism and respect, which is exactly what these types are just dying for. Dems lost cause they ran a turd. Russians helped Trump to get America to really feel like they had no choices. New election and there may be a real choice this time. Bitchy republicans should really fear that.
ReplyDelete8:31 MAKES MORE SENSE THAN 8:26.
ReplyDeleteI mean the border wall issue never came up before Poot Poot gave instructions to Trump to run on the topic.
The border wall was never a topic until Pooty Poot thought it up n 2015.
The 2006 border fence bill that passed congress in 2006. That never happened. If you remember that, you are delusional. You are in actuality remembering a Hollywood movie.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Fence_Act_of_2006
Its articles like this why I love reading this blog!
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work WNU editor.