WNU Editor: Is MP Tobias Ellwood insane? I hope this remark was taken out of context. NATO going to war against Russia will mean nuclear war.The world is full of crazy people. Proxy war with Russia are not enough for them, they want to fight Russia directly.
— Victor vicktop55 (@vicktop55) July 5, 2023
"Great Britain should start a war directly against Russia, we are fighting in Europe, we need to introduce martial law" -
The chairman of the special… pic.twitter.com/SZ3Kv9Opji
Wednesday, July 5, 2023
Defense Committee Of The British Parliament MP Tobias Ellwood Says We Must Go Directly To War Against Russia
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
43 comments:
He is not insane WNU.
You are.
Russia has to be stopped for many of the same reasons Germany needed to be stopped after it took over Czechoslovakia.
A nuclear war ends all of what you know as civilization. There are no winners, only death.
Get your head out of your ass 4:53
People like you need to be forcibly silenced before you get us all killed, you 🌈 🤡
Agreed
Maybe the west has been taken over by Satanists who wish millions dead as a sacrafice to their main man...
No one *should* want war.
When Russia invaded Ukraine, they foolishly had hoped it be over by May. Russia is the clear aggressor and is the Nazi regime of our era.
But this isn't a repeat of ww2. Russia will answer for its crimes, if not, history won't be kind to them.
But no one benefits from expanding this war.
If Russian can keep raising the ante by threatening, they will.
So counter threatening and willing to go to the may is the only counter. If that means all out war, so be it. It is the only sane choice left.
All of Hitler's earliest successes were based on fear. People feared him and so backed off. All it got them was a bigger German military machine and war anyways.
The lesson is, when someone threatens, you counter threaten or call their bluff. If or when you win, leaders around the world will take note and won't use that trick anymore.
What France did to Libya? What the US did to Iraq and Afghanistan? And so on and so on. It takes a Nazi to call a Nazi, eh?
Yes. Great idea. Note the cost will be minumin when considering you are using nuclear weapons.
Lets see.? It was about 20 or 30 years ago that a governmental study from a think tank or ABC agency calculated that in a nuke war, where we rightly use a first strike,
the casualty rate would be 20 million dead.
The idea of using a first strike is to catch the enemy off guard, thereby lessening the chance of a full blown retaliatory strike.
Not bad eh?
But realistically it will be at least 100 million for the USA.
Now this is not counting wounded , later death by fallout or collateral deaths due to the lack of modern infrastructure to keep the weak or infirm, Such as diabetics and the old alive. So figure about 200million dead or more after about 1 year. That is just in the USA.
England would be a great one to nuke. You see, being an island, its infrastructure and economic/social apparatuses are much more interconnected.
Plus there is the added bonus of the population centers being in close proximity , unlike the USA.
Yes is it not wondrous? In a nuclear war you could almost guarantee the elimination of the English as a race.
You morons who want to do this have no idea of what you are asking for.
Go ahead and nuke the Russians. Being a fatalistic race, they think it is inevitable anyway.
Btw, if the dead hand is still working , a first strike won't help that much.
War is the past
Lies that's what it's been unloved humans
Fighting over and over
The end is near people greed took over
MAGA Lawyer Lin Wood Calls It Quits Rather Than Face Disbarment
Money is wicked
"What France did to Libya? What the US did to Iraq and Afghanistan? And so on and so on. It takes a Nazi to call a Nazi, eh?"
You are a morn.
The Us was attacked from Afghanistan. the Afghan government was requested to hand over several people who actually claimed credit for the 911 attacks.
Oh yeah, and what of Libya and Iraq? Nazi sympathizer scumbag
Correct, MAD doctrine applies and they know it.
Talk about comparing apples to bananas
You haven't heard of MAD doctrine and why it's held true since 45 ?
Russia is in the right on this, Ukraine is not in NATO. But NATO thinks it is. NATO has been pushing Russia ever since 2014 (See Marie Harf). Oh and by the way the Nazi's (Asov Battalion) are on the Ukrainian side
Finally somebody gets it.
Obviously they don't think it is or you'd have a hooper's in red square , not to mention B1 B2 F35 etc.
Mmmm rolling tanks across border, murdering civillians hands bound, destroying civillian infrastructure...give me patriotic AZOV please
Hooters
Yes fazzy. you state the obvious. And that is why this pommey is a psycho for saying the brits should declare war on russia.
Hooters? Sounds good. Do they serve Scrumpy there faz?
That’s exactly what the west has done in so many countries. Like Iraq and Libya. Apples to apples Fazboy, your just too much a lefty loonie to realize it.
🤡🌍🌈
Uh, ya think? ;)
Dude those murders were by azov battalion types, on the ukraine side, executing "collaborators" probably--or just known opposition.
You're the one that's hooters for not knowing that ya can't trust the tv news any more.
No Afghans or Iraqis attacked the USA in 2001. Saudies & Kuwaities did. It's like Japan attacking Pearl Harbour & the yanks invading China for it.
The Afghans provided safe haven for Al Qaeda and knowingly did so after they bombed two US embassies in 1998.
Try harder you stupid mother fucker.
At least be entertaining, because your life depends on it. When Russia loses the war in Ukraine it will be more than oligarchs having their yachts sized. Stupid dumb ass trolls will be seized for waging war on the info space.
And there it is, it was a revenge operation on the Taliban for harbouring our enemy. And of the hundreds of thousands of Afghan civilians that bit the dust for our “special operation” ? Point is you or nobody has any leg to stand on to criticize Russia for what it’s doing. It’s justified and ain’t none of our business, you good little 🐑
^ SUCH A BRAVE LITTLE RUSSIAN ASSHOLE
THE US TOOK OVER AFGHANISTAN VERY EASILY with the assistance of Afghans like the Tajik and Uzbeks.
Problem was the Pakistani ISI did not want o give it up. And the Taliban did the usual. they bombed market places and such.
So spare me your tears supposedly for the Afghans.
My 1st day in Ramadi and what did fucking Al Qaeda do? they bombed a market place. Over a hundred casualties. where were they treated? On the American base.
what about the Iraqi hospital? Al Qaeda reserved that for their fighters. which is why the Iraqis started siding with the Us and pushed the the fucking al Qaeda types out.
If Sadam was still in charge like he should have been, isis would never have existed and Al Qaeda would never have entered Iraq. We fought for a corrupt government that lied to everybody bubs, 9/11 was likely a false flag so no reason to even go to Afghanistan either. Do you believe Russia is about to blow up one of its own nuclear power plants? Did you believe Biden when he said Russia blew up their own pipeline? And their own dam? Don’t be so gullible, your smarter than that
Forgot to mention that not only are the Taliban still in charge, but we left them to be one the best equipped militaries in Asia. Would you like to try and riddle us all that one?
America elites not taking on the Pakistani ISI meant the US was never going to win in Afghanistan. As far as the pullout Joe Biden and his puppeteers fucked that one in the ass. It is not a hard riddle.
Saddam it is said by some people blustered a lot to look strong in the face of Iran and others. that is a strategy and there is some truth to it. However, if that causes people he has attacked or fought before to get antsy that is on him.
Saddam protected 2 known terrorist groups. Saddam also protected a group the Iranians consider a terrorist group. I know, I got to stay in their digs.
Saddam also prevented inspectors form inspecting sites. I do not care what the former marine officer asshole has to say about the inspections. I saw the footage of inspectors showing up for an inspection only to be denied entrance for 2 or 3 days. After a few episodes of that and the inspection regime is compromised.
We invaded a sovereign country because we didn’t like how they were behaving. We assessed that some groups within that country posed a security risk to our own. So why can’t Russia do the same? We did a full circle here
Is that what they did? And I fought as a tanker in Ramada, attached to the second marines.
Fuck you you moron. Your likely full of shit
Don't worry about 435 he is probably the same jerk who said he was a journalist in Ukraine. sadam did support some terrorist groups. they were small and btw if you had non internet knowledge( Real world). you would know that relationship had issues. not worth invading.
the wmds? there were none, so Ritter was right. That whole war was a lie. Even Kerry and Colin Powell said so. So once again Ritter was vindicated.
Post a Comment