Wednesday, July 5, 2023

Ukraine President Zelensky Says Russia Has Planted Explosives At The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power

A Russian service member stands guard at a checkpoint near the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant outside Enerhodar in Ukraine. Photograph: Alexander Ermochenko/Reuters  

Reuters: Russia, Ukraine accuse each other of plotting imminent attack on nuclear plant 

Russia and Ukraine on Tuesday accused each other of plotting to stage an attack on the Russian-held Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station, long the subject of mutual recriminations and suspicions. 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said he told his French counterpart, Emmanuel Macron, about Russian "dangerous provocations" at the plant in southeastern Ukraine. 

Russian troops seized the station, Europe's largest nuclear facility with six reactors, in the days following the Kremlin's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. 

 Each side has since regularly accused the other of shelling around the plant and risking a major nuclear mishap.

Read more ....  

WNU Editor: Ukraine and Russian news media are saying that something big is going to happen at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power. 

Ukraine news media is saying that Russia has mined the nuclear power plant. 

Russian news media is saying that Kiev is preparing to strike the Zaporozhye facility with a 'dirty' nuclear device, and to blame Russia for the disaster that will then unfold .... Russian nuclear giant claims Ukrainian attack on power plant imminent (RT). 

The International Atomic Energy Agency says it has found no visible mines at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station. 

 Ukraine President Zelensky Says Russia Has Planted Explosives At The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power  

Ukraine warns of nuclear disaster as Russia orders staff to leave power plant -- Politico  

Russia has planted suspected explosives on Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant roofs, says Zelenskiy -- The Guardian  

Zelensky warns of Russian activity at Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant -- The Hill  

'False Flag' Allegations Fly Amid Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant Rhetoric -- DNYUZ

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, here’s the narrative for the false flag. Hopefully nothing will happen.

Anonymous said...

Right in time for the NATO summit, how convenient

Anonymous said...

first post: Russia says this
2nd post: Ukraine says this
well if they say it then it must be true

Of Prague said...

Just remember this. Russia has nothing to gain if that power plant is attacked.

So is this true? If it is not true, what will they gain? and ,So why attack the plant?

1. If the Russians do it and say the ukies did it, the elite MSM propaganda machine will deny it so the west will have a new narrative print/scream over and over and over again. . "Russia nuked Europe". And. "is a threat to us all".

2. What strategic value would there be? What battlefield gain would there be for Russia, if the Russians did blow up that plant? None.

The ukraininans have everything to gain. The radioactive fall out would be so large and extensive (at least that would be the narrative) that the ukies would say......

OH NO!! we cannot handle it!!!

The West would then say

OH!!! this is a threat to the Planet and we have to go in to do containment and clean up issues.

The NATO troops would move in.

So this is a backdoor to get involved in the war. Simple as that.

So who has the most to gain if there is an "incident at this nuke plant?

Ukies win this one, every time.

Anonymous said...

Fair point above, but, have we (NATO) -not- expanded East, against our explicit promise?

We have. So why do we do this? Why do we encircle - quite literally - Russia?

We seem to want this war - I certainly do not - but our leadership, keen to not talk about our finances and CBDC and social credit scores and Great Reset, they seem to be eager to use a war to install all this. That's what it looks like. Trillions and trillions at play. So that is the motivation, from my perspective.

I'd say if that nuclear plant goes down, it's the US or UK, the main architects of the Great Reset.
Against the will of the population, mind you. We are being taken hostage by tyrants who use our armies and institutions.

Or, as Klaus Schwab put it "we have hijacked their institutions from within". He says it out loud. His disciples.. Macron, Trudeau, .. they are all in it. And 100% of them have pushed the deadly vaccine on us.

Just saying. They share a depopulation lust on top of their desire to hide their financial (and other!!) crimes.

Anthony said...

@Of Prague

Your comment is one of the dummest things I've read in a long time.

The reason the Russians destroyed the dam was to twart the Ukranian counter offensive and redeploy hundred of kilometers of frontline troops to other areas to strengthen. Also, the russians are very bitter about the outcome of the war.

If they can't keep a region, they will very damn well make sure the Ukranians can't retake it either, if only just out of spite. The less territories they have to defend, the easier it is for them to do so.

Anonymous said...

But the Russians CAN keep these territories. It's the Ukrainians who are spiteful. Please be serious.

Anonymous said...

10:11

If it is one of the dumbest things you have ever read, it is because you lack understanding.

And it shows, because you have made a mistake in context.

Read what I wrote again and read your reply.

Did I discuss the dam at all?

No.
My post deals only with the nuke plant.

In light of this fact, your reply is not pertaining and does not make sence.

Anthony said...

Do you know what intuition is my friend? It is the ability to cross-link seemingly unrelated events or facts to draw precious insights on a given situation. If you want many exemples of this, you can for exemple read Sherlock Holms.

If your brain stops at Dam is not Nuke plant therefore not related, then you are deprieving yourself of a precious human faculty. Most modern day inventions exist because humans can see that whilst a bird is not an airplane, they share many conceptual similarities.

Have a good day sir.

OF Prague said...

That's nice and I agree.

Your flaw then is in its attempt to draw conclusions from one subject when the subject of origin is completely different. That is.

A. Post was about nuke plant.
B. Your comment said it was dumb.
C. Then you base your critic of "dumb" on factoids concerning the dam.

Therefore your whole argument is non sequitur.

You have a good day too.