Thursday, March 14, 2013

Can A U.S. Nuclear Force Of Only 300 Strategic Weapons Be Enough To Deter A Nuclear Attack On America?

Photo: United States Trident II (D-5) missile underwater launch. Wikipedia


Time To Change America’s Atomic Arsenal -- Tom Nichols, The Diplomat

The new mission for U.S. nuclear weapons -- minimum deterrence: The prevention of a major nuclear attack on America with a small force -- perhaps as low as 300 strategic weapons.

Nuclear weapons in 2013 have been pushed yet again into the policy background as more pressing matters – the appalling collapse of the U.S. budget process among them – have absorbed all of Washington’s intellectual bandwidth. President Obama’s reelection means that the United States will remain publicly committed to nuclear reductions, but the studies that were supposed to detail those further reductions are now languishing in bureaucratic limbo and are unlikely to be a high priority. If nothing changes, the U.S. strategic deterrent will stay right where it has been since the early 1990s: merely a smaller version of the force we once arrayed against the Soviet Union.

Read more ....

My Comment:
He makes a convincing argument .... that the use of nuclear weapons is what deterred both countries (the U.S. and the Soviet Union) from using nuclear weapons .... not the quantity of weapons that are available. But the Russians are not biting .... and for minimum deterrence to work it is preferable that both countries are on-board.

No comments: