Monday, July 25, 2016

NATO's Baltic Tripwire Will Not Stop Russia

(Click on Image to Enlarge)

Dianne Pfundstein Chamberlain, National Interest: NATO's Baltic Tripwire Forces Won't Stop Russia

At the recent Warsaw Summit, NATO formally announced its plan to station four battalions in the Baltics starting in early 2017 to deter Russian aggression—one each in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania and an American battalion in Poland. These small forces are intended to serve as “tripwires” signaling to Russia that an attack on one of these states would result in immediate escalation to a full-blown conflict with NATO. That is, the four battalions are supposed to convince Russia that moving against one of its Baltic neighbors would not be worth the risk of a wider war with the United States and its European allies.

The NATO tripwire force will not deter Russia from advancing into the Baltics if it wishes to do so. Simply put—cheap force cannot signal high resolve. For a country as powerful and wealthy as the United States, it will cost relatively little to station a battalion in Poland. The fact that the deployment does not impose any real risk or cost on the United States and its NATO allies means that it cannot credibly signal to Russia that the alliance is sufficiently motivated to escalate the use of force to a level necessary to expel Russia from one of the Baltic states if and when deterrence fails.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: I concur. If Russia wanted to invade .... a few NATO soldiers on the border will not stop them. Fortunately .... there is really no appetite in Russia to invade and occupy the Baltics, Ukraine, and Poland .... let alone the rest of Europe. But if the impossible becomes true and Russia  invades the Baltics .... it would be to protect the Russian civilian populations who live in these countries .... and even then such an invasion would only happen if countless lives are being lost and a humanitarian crisis has reached crisis proportions.

6 comments:

Bob Huntley said...

The West likes to rattle sabres in the hopes perhaps of stirring up a war, preferably regional, with no bombs actually falling across the Ocean.

RRH said...

If this were not so retarded, and dangerous, it would be hilarious.

If there is any "aggression" going to happen in the Baltics, especially Latvia and Estonia, it will be against the Russian diaspora. Once again, we have "the west" providing back-up for a bunch of hysterical fascists --- Nazi heritage celebrations et al.

Russia would be better off taking Detroit.

If I were Russian, I'd leave. In fact, I'd leave even if I weren't.


https://www.rt.com/news/335790-latvian-ss-march-lawmakers/

https://www.rt.com/news/ss-division-celebration-activists/









Stephen Davenport said...

Based on what, their stellar performances in the Ukraine, Chechnya, Afghanistan, Georgia, what? Sheesh. They are not even close to NATO standards, their equipment and tactics suck, so you base your assumption that the Russkies will cake walk over any NATO country on what exactly?

Jay Farquharson said...

In the Baltic's, Russia has a 38:1 advantage in manpower, 12:1 in tanks, 9:1 in aircraft,

At cruising speed, it will take a T-72BM, 7.5 hours to drive from the Russian border, to the Baltic seacoast, 4.2 hours to drive to the Polish border.

RRH said...

Hopefully just in time to run the SS legion parade over.

Aizino Smith said...

Give it a rest RRH.

The Estonian would have joined the British, French or American during WW2, if they were fighting Russia in 1941 and were in the vicinity.

Did Finland join Germany in WW2, because they were fascist or because the enemy of my enemy is my friend?

The Finns call it "The Continuation War"

Are the Finns as fascist as the Estonians?