Monday, April 3, 2017

Should The Chinese Be Permitted To Buy U.S. Money Transfer Giant MoneyGram?

Photo from Reuters

Politico: Chinese grab for U.S. money transfer giant sets off alarms

The purchase by Ant Financial, which is partially owned by the Chinese government, poses a test for the Treasury Department oversight body.

A Chinese company’s plans to acquire U.S. money transfer giant MoneyGram is raising fears that the communist government in Beijing could gain sensitive intelligence on Americans’ personal and financial information — including data on thousands of government employees and military personnel.

The purchase by Ant Financial, which is partially owned by the Chinese government, also poses a test for the 42-year-old Treasury Department oversight body that has been asked to review the deal to determine any security risks.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: Chinese state companies that do business on the international scene are focused on two things .... making money on their investments .... and gathering intelligence. This would be a big mistake for the U.S..

3 comments:

Aizino Smith said...

Trade with China is not fair.

I have seen general harassment of a former foreign services officer. They worked some years in the diplomatic corps and then worked for a company that measures things like GDP, industrial sectors, health of companies. We are not talking high tech espionage. We are talking about P/E ratios and accounting.

Investing in China is fraught with danger. They want you to invest and then will not open their books. A relative went over to check out a company to see if their could be partnership. Other than walking around and see what they could see, they got no information. Plenty of idle people. 3 to 5 people per machine. Very unproductive. The people were surly, belligerent and standoffish. Part of this might have been, because it was a Muslim area. Playing the race card did work.

iWEB TECHNOLOGIES said...

Grateful for such superb blog yours...!
Opencart Website Development

RussInSoCal said...

That's an easy "Oh, Hell No!" Even Politico gets it.