Tuesday, December 28, 2021

Pentagon Orders USS Harry S. Truman And Its Carrier Group To Stay In The Mediterranean Sea To 'Reassure' European Allies

The Pentagon has ordered the USS Harry S. Truman and its carrier group to remain in the Mediterranean Sea  

Daily Mail: Pentagon orders USS Harry S. Truman to stay in the Mediterranean Sea to 'reassure' European allies after US secured talks with Russia over Ukraine for January 10 and Putin warned the west faces a 'Cuban Missile Crisis' 

* The Pentagon has ordered the USS Harry S. Truman and its carrier group to remain in the Mediterranean Sea 

* The United States and Russian officials will hold security talks on January 10 

* Officials will meet in Geneva, where Biden and Putin met in June 

* 'We are unified as an Alliance on the consequences Russia would face if it moves on Ukraine,' a National Security Council spokesperson told DailyMail.com 

* 'But we are also unified in our willingness to engage in principled diplomacy with Russia,' the spokesperson added 

* Talks come as fresh drills with 1,000 troops were staged in western Russia 

The Pentagon has ordered the USS Harry S. Truman and its carrier group to remain in the Mediterranean Sea amid rising tensions in the Ukraine as Russian troops remain on its border. 

The aircraft carrier will remain between Greece and Italy rather than resume a planned transit through the Suez Canal, USNI reported. 

Read more ....  

WNU Editor: It is going to take more than an aircraft carrier strike group to 'reassure' European allies. 

Pentagon Orders USS Harry S. Truman And Its Carrier Group To Stay In The Mediterranean Sea To 'Reassure' European Allies  

SECDEF Orders U.S. Carrier USS Harry S. Truman to Stay in Mediterranean to Reassure Allies -- USNI News  

US warships stay in Mediterranean amid Ukraine, Russia fears -- AP  

US keeps carrier in Mediterranean amid Russia tensions -- CNA  

Austin Directs US Nuclear Aircraft Carrier Truman Stay in Mediterranean to Reassure Allies -- Sputnik

4 comments:

Caecus said...

little babies need to be reassured

Anonymous said...

They are babies. They have made many wrong decisions. If they were not babies, being small countries they would need nonetheless to be reassured. France and Britain were worried scared or concerned with Russia back in the early 19th century. Nothing has changed since then except Britain and France have gotten smaller and weaker.

Troops of victorious or soon to be victorious armies need to be reassured. So where are going with this.

On another note if you need a carrier on station to deter an enemy, then may be the problem is n not as much as the troops at hand but the leaders who are not respected. That is the carriers could be pulled, the sailors, marines and air men not treated like cogs, if the national leaders had the proper temperament and and deportment. The enemy would be just as dissuaded.

It is one thing to expect for the duration in war. For the duration is to be expected in peace. What will that cost you? Actually for having gone to a liberal arts college instead of a military academy Milley does not know. Sad.

Anonymous said...

Too bad the Euros don't have enough carrier groups between them to reassure ANYONE.

B.Poster said...

What are our European "allies" doing to reassure us? If we're attacked, will they/can they have our backs? From the looks of it, I would say a resounding no.