DNYUZ/New York Times: How Was Russia Able to Launch Its Biggest Aerial Attack on Ukraine?
The 96-missile barrage fired across Ukraine on Tuesday was Russia’s biggest aerial attack of the war so far. But it followed months of assertions by Western and Ukrainian officials that Moscow’s stockpile of missiles and other weapons was rapidly dwindling.
Whether the assault on infrastructure targets was long planned, as Ukrainian commanders say they believe, or served as a deadly response to Kyiv’s recapture of the city of Kherson last week, the widespread attack raises questions about how much Russia’s arsenal may be depleted and whether Moscow will endure by finding alternative sources of weapons.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Russia has been building missiles forever. If you follow former Russian President Medvedev's Telegram channel there are numerous videos and pictures of him inspecting weapon systems being built for the war effort, missiles included.
And while the Western narrative is that Russia is running out of missiles. I know that with the Russian economy now at a war-time footing, the Russian military has more than enough missiles to continue this war.
14 comments:
I'm speechless.
Wnu , you make them overnight lol, and they rely on western chips that have been banned
The Russian push towards Kiev was in reality a raid to retrieve all the washing machines, toasters, microwaves to be able to make new missiles after they ran out a week into the war. Same thing in Kherson, the Russians brought all the appliances to the left bank of the Dnepr and are now being dissassembled to make tje next batch of missiles
Russia built missiles during WWII. They can buy from Iran or North Korea. There are two wars inside Ukraine. One is a WWII style war on civil society and the other between combat forces. Pyrrhic victory is no win at all.
Wake up, son. You're only dreaming.
And the Easter Bunny lays candy eggs
Correct
why peoples talk shit here so much all the time?
Dreaming? Power was restored or it was not.
Shameless and embarrassing reporting as always, when it comes to foreign policy from the NYT. The only shocking thing is that they're even acknowledging their earlier claims instead of just memory-holing them and moving onto the next episode of Fazman's Fantasy.
Russia must surrender.
Surrender Russia surrender.
Do any of you get TS briefings from the Russian MOD or have inside info of a particular factory?
if you dont, then you have no idea of what the stocks look like
Bottom line all talk about shortages and disruptions and Russian doom based on western info is BS.
So all that blustering on this blog concerning certain russian defeat is half baked goo
idk. Some should get their own blog--they are wordy and pointless
lol u said a lot more than that sonny boy
Post a Comment