Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Why Conventionally Armed ICBMs Are A Dangerous Development

Non-Nuclear US ICBM Can Strike Iran In 30 Minutes -- Gizmodo

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has made an startling revelation today: The US has long-range missiles armed with high-power-but-non-nuclear explosives ready for a global strike. The (big) problem: China and Russia won't be able to distinguish between nuclear and non-nuclear ICBMs.

This is what Gates said, talking on NBC's Meet the Press:

We have, in addition to the nuclear deterrent today, a couple of things we didn't have in the Soviet days… And we have prompt global strike affording us some conventional alternatives on long-range missiles that we didn't have before.

Read more ....

My Comment: I made the same observation a week ago .... both Russia and China do not have the capability to ascertain the difference between a nuclear armed ICBM or a non-nuclear one.

As far as they are concerned .... an ICBM is an ICBM, and if launched it would probably be armed with a nuclear warhead. How they would react after such a launch is anyone's guess.

2 comments:

T. Greer said...

Even worse, it was on this basis Gates said the new Nuclear Policy Review was based. I had supported the new policy, but I don't now!

Armchair Generalist had a good post on this a few months back. Read esp. the comment by James.

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/02/why-do-we-need-prompt-global-strike.html

WNU Editor said...

Thanks T. Greer for your comment.

And you are right, Armchair Generalist does have a good post on this subject. I read him regularly, but this is something that I guess I had forgotten.