Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Why Conventionally Armed ICBMs Are A Dangerous Development
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has made an startling revelation today: The US has long-range missiles armed with high-power-but-non-nuclear explosives ready for a global strike. The (big) problem: China and Russia won't be able to distinguish between nuclear and non-nuclear ICBMs.
This is what Gates said, talking on NBC's Meet the Press:
We have, in addition to the nuclear deterrent today, a couple of things we didn't have in the Soviet days… And we have prompt global strike affording us some conventional alternatives on long-range missiles that we didn't have before.
Read more ....
My Comment: I made the same observation a week ago .... both Russia and China do not have the capability to ascertain the difference between a nuclear armed ICBM or a non-nuclear one.
As far as they are concerned .... an ICBM is an ICBM, and if launched it would probably be armed with a nuclear warhead. How they would react after such a launch is anyone's guess.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Even worse, it was on this basis Gates said the new Nuclear Policy Review was based. I had supported the new policy, but I don't now!
Armchair Generalist had a good post on this a few months back. Read esp. the comment by James.
http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/02/why-do-we-need-prompt-global-strike.html
Thanks T. Greer for your comment.
And you are right, Armchair Generalist does have a good post on this subject. I read him regularly, but this is something that I guess I had forgotten.
Post a Comment