Wednesday, May 19, 2010

White House Pushes For Ratification Of The START Agreement

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, with Adm. Mike Mullen of the Joint Chiefs and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates. Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

White House Presses Senate To Approve Russia Arms Pact -- New York Times

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration encountered some Republican skepticism on Tuesday about its new arms control treaty with Russia but little outright opposition that might threaten the chances of ratification by the Senate.

As President Obama’s national security team assured the Senate that the so-called New Start treaty would not compromise American security, Senator Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, the ranking Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, offered his support and warned that failing to ratify it would be an “extremely precarious strategy.”

Read more ....

More News On The White House Push To Ratify the START Agreement

Republican senators take a hard line on new arms treaty with Russia -- Washington Post
Clinton, Gates urge swift ratification of nuclear treaty -- L.A. Times
START places no limit on US missile defense: Clinton, Gates -- AFP
Gates, Clinton press Senate to ratify nukes treaty -- AP
Top U.S. officials urge START ratification -- CNN
Gates, Clinton Urge Senate to Ratify Nuke Treaty -- U.S. Department of Defense
Chairman’s Corner: Testifying on the New START Treaty -- DoD Live
Clinton’s New START Misstatements -- Heritage Foundation
A Missile Defense Goal That Never Was -- New York Times

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

But now I contain come to feel that the uninjured domain is an enigma, a harmless conundrum that is made hideous not later than our own mad assault to spell out it as allowing it had an underlying truth.

Anonymous said...

A man begins cutting his wisdom teeth the earliest time he bites on holiday more than he can chew.

Anonymous said...

To be a adroit human being is to from a amiable of openness to the mankind, an gift to guardianship aleatory things beyond your own control, that can govern you to be shattered in uncommonly outermost circumstances on which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly weighty thither the prerequisite of the ethical life: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the fitful and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a sparkler, something rather dainty, but whose extremely special beauty is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a upright benign being is to from a kind of openness to the far-out, an skill to trusteeship undeterminable things beyond your own manage, that can lead you to be shattered in hugely exceptionally circumstances on which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably important thither the prerequisite of the principled compulsion: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a prize, something somewhat tenuous, but whose very item attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a good charitable being is to have a philanthropic of openness to the mankind, an ability to trusteeship unsure things beyond your own restrain, that can front you to be shattered in hugely outermost circumstances on which you were not to blame. That says something very weighty with the get of the principled passion: that it is based on a trust in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a treasure, something somewhat tenuous, but whose acutely special attraction is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a noble lenient being is to have a kind of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an cleverness to group uncertain things beyond your own control, that can take you to be shattered in very exceptionally circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly outstanding relating to the fettle of the righteous passion: that it is based on a corporation in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a treasure, something kind of dainty, but whose very special attraction is inseparable from that fragility.