White House Photo, Samantha Appleton, 3/25/11Obama’s War On “War” -- Washington Times editorial
Administration tries hard to dodge the obvious.
What if they gave a war and nobody was allowed to say it? The debate over military action in Libya has lately taken an absurd twist, driven by the Obama administration’s bizarre unwillingness to call a war a war.
Everyone knows what is going on in Libya is a war, but the administration has placed a moratorium on plain English. Hence White House press secretary Jay Carney prefers to talk about a “time-limited, scope-limited military action,” which could actually describe most wars. And at a press briefing on Wednesday when Joint Task Force Odyssey Dawn Chief of Staff Rear Admiral Gerard Hueber was asked, “Do you consider yourself at war right now?” he said, expressionlessly, “we are carrying out the mission of the United Nations Security [Council] Resolution 1973 and the direction of the president in his speech.” Said one observer, “He has drunk the Kool Aid.”
Read more ....
My Comment: Mark Steyn's observations on the White House use (or should I say non-use) of the 'war' word is also delicious to read. That link is here.
1 comment:
What appears to fail the Washington Times Editor here is recognition of the will of the American people to intervene to prevent a massacre regardless of the cost. Commentaries based upon the wisdom of not to continuing to overextend ourselves, or on the lack of better definitions and/or eloquence on the part of the White House are meaningless to Americans convinced we can and need to prevent such evil, whatever it takes.
Post a Comment