Wednesday, July 13, 2011

U.S. Democrat And Republican Views Are Starting To Diverge On Military Engagements And The Military Budget -- A Commentary

Dodos On Defense: Cheap Hawks, Profligate Doves -- CBS News/(The New Republic)

The Obama administration has managed to upend the laws of ornithology. The simple fact of a Democratic commander-in-chief has transformed yesterday’s Republican hawks into today’s doves. No less miraculously, and certainly for no more high-minded reasons, Democratic doves have metamorphosed into something like hawks.

In both cases, however, the transformation has been less than complete. Democrats, beginning with a president who currently presides over wars in three countries and periodically launches fusillades at several more (if a commander-in-chief earned a ribbon each time he ordered U.S. forces into action, Barack Obama would be well on his way to acquiring a chestful), have proved reluctant to fund the means for their military aims—namely, the U.S. military itself. As for Republicans, the GOP attachment to large defense appropriations endures (though just barely), but the ghost of Robert Taft haunts the party once more, making it wary of foreign entanglements. The Republican paradox has been neatly exemplified by congressional votes to deny approval for the air campaign in Libya, and then to fund the same operation to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Read more ....

My Comment: Lawrence Kaplan lists all the contradictions of Democrat/Republican views on foreign engagements and the defense budget perfectly .... could not have said it better myself.

No comments: