Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Did The U.S. Back A Plan To Launch A Chemical Weapon Attack In Syria And Blame It On Assad's Regime?

Devastation: People gather at a site hit by what activists said was missiles fired by a Syrian Air Force fighter jet from forces loyal to Assad, at the souk of Azaz, north of Aleppo on January 13

U.S. 'Backed Plan To Launch Chemical Weapon Attack On Syria And Blame It On Assad's Regime' -- Daily Mail

Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying 'the idea is approved by Washington'
Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was 'totally unacceptable'

Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme 'approved by Washington' is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.

Read more ....

My Comment: Infowars is the source for this story .... and yes I am very very skeptical. To begin .... I doubt that the Obama administration have a coherent policy on what to do about with Syria .... hell .... after 22 months of warfare even President Obama himself has voiced his doubts on what to do in Syria. So to launch a chemical attack and blame it on Syria .... nahhhh.

But I do know that the Israelis are deeply concerned .... further reinforced by reports that Hezbollah units are now stationed near Syrian chemical depots. To say that this is raising fears in Israel is an understatement .... so it should not be a surprise that Israel's military intel chief is now traveling to the U.S. for 'consultations'.

No comments: