Sunday, June 2, 2013

Should The US Be Ready For A ‘Limited’ Nuclear War?


No Longer Unthinkable: Should US Ready For ‘Limited’ Nuclear War? -- Sydney J. Freedberg Jr., Breaking Defense

AI FORCE ASSOCIATION HQ: For more than 60 years, most Americans have thought of nuclear weapons as an all-or-nothing game. The only way to win is not to play at all, we believed, because any use of nukes will lead to Armageddon. That may no longer be the game our opposition is playing. As nuclear weapons proliferate to places that might not share our reluctance to use them in small numbers, however, the US military may face a “second nuclear age” of retail Armageddon for which it is utterly unprepared.

Outside the US, both established and emerging nuclear powers increasingly see nuclear weapons as weapons that can be used in a controlled, limited, and strategically useful fashion, said Barry Watts, an analyst with the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, arguably the Pentagon’s favorite thinktank. The Cold War “firebreaks” between conventional and nuclear conflict are breaking down, he wrote in a recent report. Russia has not only developed new, relatively low-yield tactical nukes but also routinely wargamed their use to stop both NATO and Chinese conventional forces should they overrun Moscow’s feeble post-Soviet military, Watts said this morning at the headquarters of the Air Force Association.

Read more ....

My Comment: What was unthinkable a few decades ago is now .... sadly .... becoming a talked about policy for other up-and-coming nuclear states. Should we be concerned .... definitely .... can we do something about it .... probably not.

No comments: