Smaller Military Plans For A Nimble, Expeditionary Future -- USA Today
What would a smaller military look like and how would it fight?
USA TODAY reported over the weekend that the Army has been told to plan to lop off 100,000 soldiers if the automatic budget cuts known as sequestration continue until the end of the decade. Army brass are coming to terms with what a force of 420,000 could and could not. do. It has about 530,000 soldiers now. The other services will be taking hits, too, according to a senior Pentagon official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the details are not public.
First, what smaller armed forces probably won't do: wage long-term wars. A few years ago, the White House declared in its strategy that the Pentagon would no longer maintain forces big enough to to conduct stability operations, such as those in Iraq and Afghanistan. Don't forget how to fight counterinsurgencies, the strategic guidance states. Just don't plan on having forces big enough to sustain them over a long period of time.
Read more ....
My Comment: If the Pentagon and the White House are thinking like this .... reducing the military to suit budgetary goals .... this will then mark a strategic shift away from the past when foreign policy objectives and threats were first assessed and then followed with the necessary budget that the Pentagon would require to meet these goals. But like much of Washington today .... budgetary restraints and policies are changing .... and the military's budget is now in the cross-airs of this change.
No comments:
Post a Comment