Sunday, August 10, 2014

Critics Of President Obama's Iraq Strategy Are Now Starting To Speak Out



TWO Retired Four-Star Generals Blast Obama For Failing To Use 'Decisive' Force in Iraq With 'Pinprick' Attacks For 'Political Posturing' -- Daily Mail

* Retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey laid into Obama on Friday, saying bombing runs against ISIS positions are political posturing
* 'These are political gestures using military power,' he said, lamenting the president's lack of commitment to a full-blown military campaign
* Obama ran for president on a platform of getting US military out of Iraq but began bombing runs Friday morning in the country's northern region
* White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest assured reporters on Friday that a ground-troop incursion is out of the question
* GOP critics are hammering the White House for not being more aggressive
* House Speaker John Boehner said the White House has an 'ongoing absence of a strategy for countering the grave threat ISIS poses'
* Obama underestimated ISIS in January, telling The New Yorker that 'If a jayvee team puts on Lakers uniforms that doesn't make them Kobe Bryant'

Two retired four-star U.S. Army Generals heaped scorn Friday on President Barack Obama's authorization of targeted airstrikes in northern Iraq, with one war hero calling it a 'political gesture' calculated to provide the impression that the U.S. is 'doing something' about a humanitarian crisis developing there.

'There's a huge tragedy unfolding: 1.5 million refugees, a couple of hundred thousand just in the last few weeks. 50,000 of this minority group stuck on – up in the mountains,' Gen. Garry McCaffrey said on MSNBC.

'But these are political gestures using military power.'

Read more ....

Update #1: Gen. McCaffrey ‘Dismayed’ by U.S. Strategy in Iraq, Calls it ‘Muddled Thinking’ -- Washington Free Beacon
Update #2: As ISIS Militants Exert Their Control, U.S. Pursues a Military Middle Road -- NYT

My Comment: Retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey analysis is spot on .... U.S. military strikes in Iraq do not have a strategic coherence that will not make me feel comfortable that ISIS will eventually be defeated. In short .... I cannot help but feel that the main reason for these strikes is political .... to give credit to the White House for giving the appearance of doing something useful.

On a side note .... the New York Times is praising President Obama's military strategy to Counter ISIS .... As ISIS Militants Exert Their Control, U.S. Pursues a Military Middle Road (NYT). But what I would like to know is .... what is a military middle of the road military policy?

1 comment:

Philip said...

"Middle of the road" is likely along the lines of what Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA/likely Presidential candidate) stated: Do something, watch and then ratchet up just enough to 'encourage' Iraq and ISIS to start negotiations toward a settlement.

Whether or not that will survive reality is debatable. For now, it's playing well to Mr. Obama's (and by extension, MS. Warren's) political base.