Image: Flickr/AereiMilitari.org
James Jay Carafano, National Interest: 'Game-Changing' Weapons: What the U.S. Military Needs to Know
Game-changers are clearly not a substitute for fielding conventional and strategic capabilities. But game-changing ought to be part of U.S. military strategy.
Who isn’t fascinated by the prospect of "game-changers"—unprecedented technological breakthroughs that provide military advantages that leave competitors scratching their heads over how to keep up? Game-changers can increase leverage, so pursuing them makes sense—but only if the game-changer supports the overall security strategy.
Game-changers are not a substitute for fielding conventional and strategic capabilities. But game-changing ought to be part of U.S. military strategy.
2 comments:
National Interest is evidently infected with something. My computer shuts off the connection with a warning.
You are probably right Anon. I have all the top anti-spyware/virus programs on my main computer .... and it sometimes red-flags me on National Interest.
Post a Comment