Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Poll: Most Arab Youth Reject The Islamic State and Think It Will Fail


VICE News: Survey Says Most Arab Youth Reject the Islamic State and Think It Will Fail

A new 16 country survey of Arab youth shows that support for the Islamic State is cratering — the majority of Arabs polled from ages 18-24 agree that the group is both a major threat, and will ultimately fail.

The poll was conducted by ASDA'A Burson-Marsteller, a public relations firm which has kept tabs on Arab public opinion for the past eight years. Last year, around 60 of those surveyed said they were strongly opposed to the Islamic State — this year, that number's up to 80. A full 78 percent of respondents said they wouldn't support the Islamic State even if the group weren't so violent, and 76 percent predicted the group will fail in its goal to establish a caliphate. Half of those surveyed said the group's rise was the 'biggest obstacle' facing the region.

The data is based on 3,500 face-to-face interviews with participants between the age of 18-24 in Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestine, Tunisia and Yemen — Syria was excluded from the survey because the civil war hampered the data collection.

Read more ....



More News On Recent Poll That Most Arab Youth Reject The Islamic State and Think It Will Fail

Young Arabs see Islamic State as biggest regional challenge: poll -- Reuters
Isis not supported by overwhelming majority of young Arabs, research suggests -- The Independent
Arab Youth Condemn ISIS, Blame Lack Of Jobs For Increasing Recruitment By Islamic State Group -- IBTimes
Young Arabs Reject ISIS, Worry About Lack Of Jobs, Poll Finds -- NPR
Young Arabs reject ISIS in new survey -- New York Post
Arab Spring legacy continues to fade in eyes of region’s youth -- The National
ISIS in turmoil as new survey reveals young Arabs shunning terror group in growing numbers -- Express
5 charts that show how young Arabs really feel about the Islamic State -- Washington Post

No comments: