Tuesday, October 17, 2017

Can You Buy The U.S. Presidency For $100,000?



Mark Penn, Wall Street Journal: You Can’t Buy the Presidency for $100,000

Russia didn’t win Trump the White House any more than China re-elected Bill Clinton in 1996.

The fake news about fake news is practically endless. Americans worried about Russia’s influence in the 2016 election have seized on a handful of Facebook ads—as though there weren’t also three 90-minute debates, two televised party conventions, and $2.4 billion spent on last year’s campaign. The danger is that bending facts to fit the Russia story line may nudge Washington into needlessly and recklessly regulating the internet and curtailing basic freedoms.

After an extensive review, Facebook has identified $100,000 of ads that came from accounts associated with Russia. Assume for the sake of argument that Vladimir Putin personally authorized this expenditure. Given its divisive nature, the campaign could be dubbed “From Russia, With Hate”—except it would make for a disappointing James Bond movie.

Analyzing the pattern of expenditures, and doing some back-of-the-envelope math, it’s clear this was no devilishly effective plot. Facebook says 56% of the ads ran after the election, reducing the tally that could have influenced the result to about $44,000. It also turns out the ads were not confined to swing states but also shown in places like New York, California and Texas. Supposing half the ads went to swing states brings the total down to $22,000.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: Mark Penn polled for the Clinton's for two decades, and his commentary and analysis is the best that I have read so far on the Russian use of social media in influencing the U.S. Presidential election. And yes .... it is easier to blame focus on the Russians rather than how Hillary Clinton squandered a billion dollar plus campaign budget and her husband's legacy to lose the campaign.

Plus: “The only way Russia will get its money’s worth is if Washington overreacts and narrows the very freedoms that make America different in the first place.” Yup .... and that is exactly what is happening right now.

2 comments:

Jay Farquharson said...

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Robert_Mercer

https://qz.com/1104195/russian-political-hacking-the-internet-research-agency-troll-farm-by-the-numbers/

War News Updates Editor said...

I am familiar with TV Rain's reports. The problem is that they are quoting one anonymous source in a hoodie. RBC's report is more in depth, but the source of their information is also from an anonymous source. These Russian reports are also contradicting what Facebook is reporting. So who to believe? Russian reports, or Facebook's. I leave that to all of you to decide.