Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year https://t.co/vXKRV1wRJc— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) October 24, 2017
WNU Editor: I have been reading the twitter feeds of the political reporters who work the Washington scene. Many are saying the same thing that Maggie Haberman from the New York Times is saying in the above tweet .... they feel that they have been used by sources that they trust in the Democrat Party, and by sources close to Hillary Clinton and her campaign team. In short .... they feel betrayed.
6 comments:
WNU,
"In short .... they feel betrayed." this is heart breaking...............Heh!
https://wonkette.com/623439/new-york-timess-maggie-haberman-has-chosen-to-be-a-dick-today
https://wonkette.com/624241/hi-maggie-haberman-new-nyt-social-media-guidelines-did-you-read-them-maggie-haberman-did-you
I knew about this months ago. The reporters have no excuse to not know. It's not a secret or cover-up, as the Republicans are claiming.
Haberman's clueless, and her response to having her shoddy "reporting" being called out, corrected or criticized, is to viciously attack her critics or block them on social media.
Can we now finally agree that yes Putin wanted HRC to be president.
The Russia Trump comnection was a disinformation campaign creayed by Putin.
This dossier was part of it.
No, Jim, we can not agree on anything as yet...it is now not a question of who paid for the stuff but as Mueller is trying to find out, how accurate the material is...If Putin was doing disinformnation, then whyh all the social media ads that support Trump?
Post a Comment