The Guardian: Sexual violence in war zones at ‘worst ever’ as drive to protect women falters
Fall in global funding and weak UK initiative hamper attempts to save Rohingya and help victims in other conflict areas
The head of UN Women has condemned the inadequate response to the widespread use of rape and sexual violence in conflicts, and warned that the amount of money dedicated to fighting such war crimes is shrinking.
Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, executive director of the UN organisation dedicated to gender equality and empowerment, said “new types of violence and torture, worse than anything we’ve ever seen before” have been used against Rohingya women in Myanmar, yet only 2% of money sent to conflict settings is spent on improving women’s rights, while funding for UN Women fell 5% between 2013 and 2016.
Read more ....
Update #1: UN Women Chief Says Peanuts Spent on Battling Sexual Abuse (Sputnik)
Update #2: Male rape and sexual torture in the Syrian war: ‘It is everywhere’ (The Guardian)
WNU Editor: The UN Women website is here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
So let's have a war.
Seriously, a UN program is bogus.
Break heads 1st, gain control of the space, and then have a program & a prosecutions will mean something.
It is like Sally Struthers and famine relief. It is a joke. It made sense in the 1970s and 1980s, but people started to think is this famine relief 2.0, 3.0,.... n.0.
Sally Struither is now more a sarcastic meme than effective.
I can't help but wonder if guys like Weinstein read news like this and think to themselves "damn, how can I get in on all that raping and molesting action in war zones" (and probably are close to booking a ticket).
Half joking, of course...but still.
Post a Comment