The Hill: Watchdog: Troops say they were told to ignore Afghan child sex abuse
A new inspector general report released Thursday found that while the Pentagon did not have formal guidance discouraging the reporting of child sex abuse in Afghanistan, several troops say they were still informally told to ignore it.
“Following a review of DoD Instructions, Command Policy and Service guidance, we did not identify any guidance or policy that expressly discouraged personnel from reporting incidents of child sexual abuse,” according to the unclassified version of the Department of Defense inspector general report.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: The Inspector General's report is here .... Implementation of the DoD Leahy Law Regarding Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse by Members of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (Inspector General/US Department of Defense).
More News On U.S. Troops In Afghanistan Being Told To Ignore Child Sexual Abuse
US Forces Told to Ignore Child Sex Abuse By Afghan Forces -- Code & Dagger
Report: U.S. troops told to ignore child rape by Afghan security forces -- UPI
The DoD Has Barely Made A Dent In Afghan Security Forces’ Child Sex Abuse Problem -- Task & Purpose
US troops taught sexual abuse was 'culturally accepted practice' in Afghanistan -- RT
Were Any U.S.-Backed Afghan Troops Punished for Raping Kids? That’s Classified. -- Daily Beast
4 comments:
Why Didn't Liberals Embrace 'Whiskey Tango Foxtrot'?
https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/didnt-liberals-embrace-whiskey-tango-foxtrot/
Did not do well at the box office, but this is a movie to see.
The movie reviews show the multi-cult is alive and well with the multi-kooks.
Smith needs to stop swallowing PJ silliness as gospel truth. In fact the liberal (?) NY Times, Roger Ebert, etc did not dismiss the film on the grounds alleged by PJmedia but mostly because of Tina being, well, strictly Tina...but no: the reveiws from the liberals are not bad at all but the film is not great one, so no real need to diss the liberals: they reviewed it; they made the film; and some liberals even saw it. Time Smithy to review your reviews and try to say something without the crutch of liberalism to act as your tinfoil for the world's ills. (and yes, I continue to post nudes)
I did not mention the New York Slime, a former newspaper, in my two posts.
The critics from Village Voice and 'Harveywood' Reporter certainly went full frontal liberal.
The column was written by Bruce Bawer.
Tell me Mr Fred Lapides.
- Is Bruce Bawer silly?
- Is he only silly, when his columns appear at PJ Media?
- If Mr Bawer columns are not silly, are they silly if they are first published at PJ Media?
The story about the destroyed well in the movie reminded of the story, "A Jury of Her Peers", about a woman, who murdered her farmer husband. The sheriff go to the farmhouse and hold an investigation with several other men. The womenfolk join the men. The women actually solve the motive for the murder. The men are clueless. So the well story within the movie struck me as hilarious and shows foibles. You would think a liberal would like the well story, but they were too busy being outraged. All these soldiers engaged in civic action and it is the embedded female reporter who gets the truth. Two birds with one stone. Talk about elegance.
Reading Mr Egbert's review, one thing comes across. He dumps on Tina Fey. He says she has no versatility. Fair enough. But, if that does not distract from the movie, what is the harm?
I have not seen a lot of Tina Fey movies, so I do not know if she has versatility or not. So it is a non issue. It is also a non-issue for the box office if people are looking for comedy and if people don;t mind immediately recognizing everything about the actor. When you saw a John Wayne movie, you basically got John Wayne. When I watch a movie with Damon Wayans as the lead character, it is basically a Damon Wayan's movie. So Egberts' criticism fall flat IMHO.
IMO found a thing to harp about so that he could easily dispatch the movie as a nothing movie. In reality this movie is going to become a cult classic and it will never get old.
Liberalism is the problem. They are the ones pushing Multi-KKKult
"Trojan Horse debate: We were wrong, all cultures are not equal"
" (and yes, I continue to post nudes)" According to the world view of Eric Holder and using his disproportionate impact theory, you are a white racist.
https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/whiskey-tango-foxtrot-2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Jury_of_Her_Peers
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10892606/Trojan-Horse-debate-We-were-wrong-all-cultures-are-not-equal.html
BTW Fred, your main man Obama lied.
Bin Laden Docs Show Obama Misled, Politicized Intelligence During 2012 Campaign
https://pjmedia.com/trending/bin-laden-documents-show-obama-politicized-intelligence-2012-campaign/
"New York Times Reporter: Obama Administration Misled on al Qaeda"
http://www.weeklystandard.com/new-york-times-reporter-obama-administration-misled-on-al-qaeda/article/2010541
Even the New York Slime, a former newspaper, admits it now that Obummer is safely out of office and they no longer need him.
Fred, this means you have permission to hate Obama; the NYT has given you permission to hate Obama. In fact they will demand it, when they have an official "Two Minutes of Hate"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Minutes_Hate
Post a Comment