Sunday, December 3, 2017

FBI Agent Responsible For The Clinton Email Investigation Now Facing A Review By The FBI's Inspector General



FOX News: Mueller aide fired for anti-Trump texts now facing review for role in Clinton email probe

EXCLUSIVE – Two senior Justice Department officials have confirmed to Fox News that the department's Office of Inspector General is reviewing the role played in the Hillary Clinton email investigation by Peter Strzok, a former deputy director for counterintelligence at the FBI who was removed from the staff of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III earlier this year, after Mueller learned that Strzok had exchanged anti-Trump texts with a colleague.

A source close to the matter said the OIG probe, which will examine Strzok's roles in a number of other politically sensitive cases, should be completed by "very early next year."

The task will be exceedingly complex, given Strzok's consequential portfolio. He participated in the FBI's fateful interview with Hillary Clinton on July 2, 2016 – just days before then-FBI Director James Comey announced he was declining to recommend prosecution of Mrs. Clinton in connection with her use, as secretary of state, of a private email server.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: If President Trump's tweets this morning are any indication .... he is clearly upset that the FBI agent responsible for the Clinton email probe may have been politically biased. It is also now being reported that he was the FBI agent who interviewed Hillary Clinton over her use of a private server .... but kept no record or transcript of the meeting. Interestingly .... a few days after this "interview", then-FBI Director James Comey announced he was declining to recommend prosecution of Mrs. Clinton in connection with her use, as secretary of state, of a private email server. What's my take .... now knowing the context on how these decisions were made .... there is a problem here. The FBI has to be beyond partisanship .... or even the appearance of partisanship .... especially when it comes to politicians and senior government officials. One only has to look at the contrast on how Special Counsel Robert Mueller is handling his investigation of the Trump administration .... Inside the secretive nerve center of the Mueller investigation (Washington Post), to how FBI agent Peter Strzok and the FBI Director Comey handled theirs. The IG is now saying that their review of FBI agent  Peter Strzok will be completed early next year .... I suggest that they better speed up that report, and explain very clearly why was he removed from the Mueller team, and why did he conduct his investigation of Hillary Clinton in the manner that he did.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's amazing, the Russians have nearly succeeded in tearing the US to pieces, by a simple email hack (allegedly) and $50k in facebook advertising. Who'd a thunk it would be that easy to bring a whole "Super-Power"country down.

Anonymous said...

The country is being torn down from within. Classic destabilizing strategy by a desperate segment.
But if you want to believe the Mighty Wurlitzer, then I have a bridge to sell you.

Unknown said...

So if Peter Strzok kept no record and the B______ Comey wrote the letter exonerating Hillary weeks or months before ending the investigation, it seems that Comey and the Demonrats are in trouble.

Comey has no provable basis on which he made his decision. We just have his word for it.

Wheels are coming off the bus and the Demonrats are in for a wild ride.

Anonymous said...

So what you are saying is that there's a possibility that people are using the "Russian" story as a way to achieve a political outcome that they failed to achieve by election?

Anonymous said...

Sompin stinks.

B.Poster said...

Anonymous (comments 2 and 4),

This is exactly the case. I've been pointing it out here and elsewhere for quite awhile. It's actually even worse. These petty losers have undermined and very likely destroyed a very careful diplomatic initiative with Russia that took months if not years to put together that could have ended Cold War 2 or at the very least eased tensions.

Anonymous (comment 1),

The notion that Russia could do such a thing with such a minimal investment is ridiculous on its face. Anyone clinging to such a belief is probably blinded by ideology. Furthermore we don't even know that Russia was behind the hack. Like the Russians or not they and their leaders are focused on doing big things. An American presidential election is not going to warrant their interest.

As for the idea of America being a "super power," numerous articles presented by the editor of this website soundly refute such a myth.