The Warzone/The Drive: Queen Elizabeth Class Carriers Have Woefully Inadequate Close-In Air Defense Capabilities
The Ministry of Defense seems to have skimped on the carriers' ability to fend off anti-ship cruise missile barrages.
There are an endless number of opinions regarding the relevancy, operational feasibility, and overall opportunity cost of the UK's two new Queen Elizabeth class supercarriers, and the ship's capabilities are always part of this debate as well. But one thing seems glaringly clear—these massive vessels are woefully lacking when it comes to their ability to defend themselves from an anti-ship missile barrage.
These mighty ships displace 70,000 tons, will deploy with over 1,500 souls onboard, and will carry dozens of aircraft that collectively cost billions of dollars, yet they are only equipped with three Mk15 Phalanx close-in weapon systems (CIWS), with each covering a slice of airspace surrounding the vessel. The decades old Phalanx remains a capable system in its upgraded form, especially against traditional anti-ship cruise missiles and small unmanned aircraft. It can engage small surface threats as well. But it also suffers from limited magazine depth, highly limited reach, and is not that well suited to defend the ship against higher-end supersonic and stealthy cruise missiles that are now proliferating around the globe.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Can someone say "sitting duck"?
3 comments:
Close air defence is top secret, it will consist of wave weapons, uavs and manned aircraft. The most effective anti ship tool of WW2 was the kamikaze. It is still true today, where hypersonic icbm can reach mach14+, the only hope to intercept could infact be a human pilot as shown with Putins trip to Syria.
In the past carrier were to have 2 cruisers (AAW) and 4 destroyers. That is for the Americans and is dated.
Antique weaponry has been decisive in the past. Biplanes (Swordfish) ultimately led to the downfall of the German cruisers Bismark. So while this carrier might be obsolete, I bet it can be decisive if played right.
Usually you send an AWACS out ahead of a carrier group to scout. So that extends your range of defense or avoidance. Your opponent is at risk when launching standoff weapons like cruise missiles. Closeness is relative
A ship, plane or vehicle is just a weapons platform to hang weapons on. If they have space such as a sponson, they can always hang on more weapons later.
"Close air defence is top secret, it will consist of wave weapons, uavs and manned aircraft. "
i.e putting an AWACS out front with a CAP
Post a Comment