Saturday, February 10, 2018

CIA Denying Reports That U.S. Intelligence Officers Were Bilked $100,000 In A Deal To Retrieve Stolen NSA Cyberweapons And Dirt On President Trump


Daily Mail: 'This is fictional and patently false': CIA denies it paid $100k to Russian spy who claimed he had stolen NSA cyberweapons and dirt on Trump - as President says article shows the need to 'drain the swamp'

* Report claimed US intelligence officials desperate to get back stolen cyberweapons paid $100,000 to a Russian operative
* Said he was in possession of compromising information on President Trump
* The Russian reportedly said he had photos showing Trump in Moscow with hookers
* CIA has now taken the unusual step of publicly denying the claims
* Said the only people swindled were the authors of the story
* Trump then weighted in, tweeted approvingly that original article shows the need to "drain the swamp" in Washington.

The CIA has angrily hit back at reports that a mystery Russian was paid $100,000 after claiming he had dirt on President Trump as well as stolen cyberweapons.

The New York Times has claimed on Friday that the Russian took the money but failed to turn over the stolen material or the dirt on Trump.

The outlet said that the CIA began meeting with the unidentified spy early last year after he claimed to have cyberweapons stolen from the National Security Agency. The man also told American officials that he had images of Trump hanging out with hookers in Moscow in 2013.

Read more ....

Update: CIA denies report over mystery Russian who promised Trump info (AFP)

Previous Post: U.S. Intelligence Officers Were Bilked $100,000 In A Deal Where They Were To Receive NSA Secrets And Compromising Material On President Trump (February 10, 2018)

WNU Editor: President Trump had to respond .... Trump responds to article on US intel operation: 'Drain the swamp' (CNN).

2 comments:

Unknown said...

$100,000 grand? That's it? The Pentagon can't account for trillions and this is news? Uggh there are no words as I am lost.

SCOTTYD said...
This comment has been removed by the author.