Thursday, July 19, 2018

Should The U.S. Defend Places Like Montenegro?



DW: NATO hits back at President Trump's Montenegro World War III remarks

NATO has been forced to reassert its collective defense clause after Donald Trump raised doubt over the US' commitment to defending Balkan partner Montenegro. The US President described Montenegrins as "very aggressive."

NATO officials on Wednesday scrambled to reassert the alliance's collective defense clause — commonly referred to as Article 5 — after US President Donald Trump appeared to suggest NATO's newest member Montenegro could instigate World War III.

A NATO official told Germany's DPA news agency that Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty was "unconditional and iron-clad," reaffirming that "an attack on one is an attack on all."

In a television interview Tuesday night, Trump appeared to cast doubt over the US' commitment to defending NATO partner Montenegro in the event of an attack. Fox News host Tucker Carlson asked Trump "why should my son go to Montenegro to defend it from attack," to which the president responded "I've asked the same question."

Read more ....

WNU Editor: I have always advocated that a debate is needed on what is the purpose of NATO, the role and contribution of its members, what should be its strategic goals, and as we have learned recently .... how to respond to its own members when they make decisions that directly impact the safety of the alliance (Germany on energy and Turkey buying the S-400 defense systems to name a few recent incidents). Because lets face facts .... the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact ended 27 years ago. But even though the world has changed, NATO continues to operate in the same manner as it did decades ago. Unfortunately .... as it was revealed yesterday when President Trump and Tucker Carlson decided to discuss the issue .... the foreign policy establishment and the media do not want this debate, and for good reason. They know that the mass majority of Americans do not want to send their sons and daughters to defend places like Montenegro. The never-ending wars in Afghanistan and in the Middle East has taught Americans to be very skeptical when leaders talk about defense commitments and security .... and they do not need me anymore to explain why.

More News On President Trump's Remarks On Montenegro

Trump blasts Montenegro, questions NATO mutual defense -- AFP
Trump calls out 'very aggressive' Montenegro in latest NATO jibe -- NBC
Montenegro could get aggressive and lead us into World War III: Trump's bizarre attack on a NATO ally after Fox News's Tucker Carlson asks why should 'my son go to Montenegro to defend it' -- Daily Mail
Trump: Supporting Tiny NATO Ally Montenegro Could Start WWIII -- Military.com/Stars and Stripes
Trump Ponders NATO Article 5: Montenegro 'May Get Aggressive & You're in WWIII' -- Sputnik
Trump Goes After Montenegro, a ‘Tiny Country’ With ‘Aggressive People’ -- Krishnadev Calamur, The Atlantic
Why the US is obligated to defend Montenegro -- Ryan Browne, CNN

3 comments:

jac said...

We need a new alliance for the 21st century! The world has changed! We cannot stay frozen in the 20th century which is finished! Please God help us!

B.Poster said...

"...the vast majority of Americans don't want to send their sons and daughters to defend places like Montengro..." I have pointed this out for a very long time. For doing so I have been accused of being a troll and worse on this website.

I remember when Montengro joined NATO and the congratulatory statement from John Kerry. With any alliance I ask the following: "when we are invaded can this country or will this country come to America and fight along side us?" In the case of Montengro, the answer to both questions is very likely "no." As such, they do not add value to us and they are an enormous cost center. They very likely view us as their chumps to be used and abused.

Of course Turkey buys the S-400. This is probably the best air defense system in the world. Of course Germany makes energy deals with Russia. This serves their economic interests. Russia is not a threat but Germany loves their NATO largess and as an added bonus should things go awry America will bear the brunt of a Russian reprisal, not Germany.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.