L.A. Times: Cohen has ‘knowledge’ of Russia campaign conspiracy, lawyer says
President Trump’s former personal lawyer Michael Cohen has “knowledge” about computer hacking and collusion that may interest Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III in his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, Cohen’s lawyer said.
One day after Cohen pleaded guilty to illegal campaign finance charges over hush money paid to a porn actress and a former Playboy model — all but naming Trump as having ordered him to do it — Cohen’s lawyer said Wednesday he would be happy to share the information with the special counsel or Congress.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Lanny Davis has since qualified his claim that his client has information on Trump-Russian collusion by using the word "may".
More News On Michael Cohen's Lawyer Claim That His Client Has Details Of Trump-Russia Collusion-Conspiracy
Cohen willing to tell Mueller about ‘conspiracy to collude’: lawyer -- NYPost
Cohen lawyer Lanny Davis suggests his client has knowledge implicating Trump in ‘criminal conspiracy’ to hack Democratic emails -- Washington Post
Cohen's lawyer says he's completely flipped and will give information of Trump-linked conspiracy with Russia -- Business Insider
Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen has knowledge of ‘conspiracy to collude,’ lawyer says -- The Boston Globe
23 comments:
next week it will be somthing new. we never see any of there claims
I'm still waiting for evidence... Been a year and a half now? There just grasping at straws.
How many indictments and how many sentencings thus far?
This Cohen/Manafort thing here confused by confused comments as though part of Mueller investigation. It is not. Though clearly when both convicted people flip, Mueller will have lots of solid materials to work with.
Are we tired of winning?
8 I think it was, but nothing about Russian collusion. Yea materials bwahaha!! I mean if Trumps committed and type of impeachable offense I'm all for it. As of yet no crime has been committed.
Any* oops
Trump committed a federal crime, breaking federal election laws.
He willfully caused an illegal corporate campaign contribution and made an excessive campaign contribution. The only reason he hasn't been indicted is because there are no rules of the road for indicting a sitting president.
In addition, considering the frauds, felons, boobs and wife-beaters he's picked to work in the administration; It's safe to say his judgement stinks.
Ah Lapides,
Answers please.
anon
that comment not from me
Emily Dickinson, dying, asked by her aunt: Emily, do you have any answers? Emily: what is the question
Fred, if this is not, as you say, part of the Mueller 'investigation', what is the Mueller 'investigation' about?
If an investigation in this government is as without direction as Mueller's is, and is initiated on falsehoods as is this one, who in this country is safe from a witch hunt like this one?
That this has happened in America and is based upon now acknowledged falsehoods created by people who have admitted these falsehoods and were paid for same, then used in a document that was then used by an unprofessional and vengeful segment of the FBI who have admitted they did no background investigation of the claims in that document and which became the basis for this embarrassment to that lady in New York harbor, is beyond defense. Got that Fred? Beyond defense.
It is the best of the monsters of history to include Herr Hitler's regime, Stalin and Beria, Lenin, Mao, and all the rest. If I believed in reincarnation, Fred, I would check you for a swath of greasy hair constantly falling over your left eye, an unbecoming moustache, and an armband with a peculiar design.
Shame on you Fred. Shame on you.
Roger
Lapides,
OK Lapides to refresh your "memory"
Give an example of Brennan's "right of free speech" being infringed upon?
"intel guys, i imagine know more about what is taking place than we do"
What gives you the authority to use the plural "we" in this case?
Those have been and remain my questions, unanswered.
so me the man ill show u the crime im pretty sure some other commies played that way
Joseph Stalin would be proud of his comrades in the US
* show
to tell intel guys they will lose clearance--a clear threat--is to tell them they ought not be critical of the president, or else. that is an infringement of free speech and other in the intel community are fully aware of this now
Since when does security clearance equal free speech if that's the case mines being infringed upon
if I am punished, ie losing my clearance, because of what I say, and I do not give away secret stuff, then my freedom to speak is being impinged upon. If you do not understand that, you need further schooling
more like they or getting hit in the wallet they can still circle jerk on CNN all they want no free speech infringed on
Jones: grow up
Smith
seems like you are not keeping up on the news but feel free to make snarky comments as though you were aware of the news
THIS IS WHAT MUELLER GROUP INVESTIGATING Now can you see the difference between that, ongoing, and the Cohen/Manifort trials and guilty pleas and how some of what is being said, done, flipped, will also be a part of Mueller work?ps: calling silly names may get your juices running but is an embarrassment to grown-ups?
sorry didnt mean to offend you it's probably the only Channel they let you watch in your nursing home
Trump and his family?
If you don't as you say "give away secret stuff", what is to stop you from speaking?
Brennan was triggered and upset. So he shouts loudly. The left perfectly identifies with that because that's what they do. Shout loudly, form mobs and force you into suppression. Whatever the outrage cause of the day is. It's fun to watch until they come for something you like, Fred. And we both know they'll come for you and your smut hobby sooner or later. Good luck to you, Fred. The left always eats their own in the end.
Post a Comment