Tuesday, September 18, 2018

U.S. Supreme Court Nominee Judge Kavanaugh Accuser Wants A Full FBI Investigation Before She Will Testify



CNN: Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying

The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault says the FBI should investigate the incident before senators hold a hearing on the allegations.

In a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and obtained by CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360," Christine Blasey Ford's attorneys argue that "a full investigation by law enforcement officials will ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the Committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions."

Read more ....

Update #1: Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before she will testify: lawyer (Reuters)
Update #2: Kavanaugh’s accuser wants FBI probe before she testifies (AP)

WNU Editor: I have avoided this story since it broke out, but a few readers have asked for my opinion, so here it is. I asked a very close friend who was sexually assaulted when she was young on what was her take on this case .... especially Christine Blasey Ford's statment that she does not remember the date/year, home, street, etc. on when this alleged assault occurred. My friend's  answer .... in her case she does not only know the exact date and location .... but also the exact time during the day when she was raped. And from what she learned through counseling and hearing stories of other rape victims .... everyone who goes through that type of experience will remember every detail as if it happened yesterday. Is Christine Blasey Ford an exception to this rule .... who knows. But no one has corroborated her accusations .... in fact .... the opposite has happened. Her decision to not testify unless an FBI investigation is conducted  also does not surprise me. She clearly has no proof, and hopes that an FBI investigation will find something. But an FBI investigation will take months to be completed .... if not more .... and I sincerely doubt that they will find anything. So why send a letter to Senator Feinstein in the first place to get this whole thing going? Is this all about revenge .... to get back at Judge Kavanaugh's mother who was the judge who presided over the foreclosure of her parent's home? Why the drama of not showing up when you now have an audience who wants to hear your case and who sincerely want to know why you see yourself as a victim of an assault. Your guess is as good as mine, and for all I know this narrative may change tomorrow. Unfortunately for Judge Kavanaugh the damage to his reputation and harm to his family has already been done, and this cloud will always be over his head.

34 comments:

Anonymous said...

The D’s are repeating the Clarence Thomas Supreme Court confirmation script. Smears and innuendo by a women.
It won’t work now just like it didn’t work against current Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas.

jac said...

This kind of "denunciation" remind me the very dark time of the Nazi of French occupation. My parents told me that anyone who to get rid of a neighbor could make this kind of dirt. Sad the Democrat's are falling in this way.

Roger Smith said...

That this woman or anyone can claim anything and get away with it with little or no risk while the accused can end up losing everything even if judged not guilty is not acceptable. Tyrants such as Mueller are virtually playing risk free. It is a lose lose situation for the accused and it is played to the hilt shamelessly.
And what irritates me to death is the alleged adults in the government talk their talk with their fellow suits and try to project an image of concern and righteousness about something that doesn't mean a damn to them but in reality is simply a tool to get their legislative way.
This is as low a point in this country's ethical history as I have ever experienced. It points out a grave flaw in our legal system when anything that can pass as a human being is allowed to create such a situation.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for not covering this story, the level of stupidity surrounding it is enough to drown anyone and everyone.

Anonymous said...

I would agree with wnu. I was robbed once and I remember the details pretty much, the time of the day for sure, the exact location and how it went down etc. It's been nearly 3 decades and I remember it like yesterday.

Am I the only one who thinks that we're entering a new time in which ideologically motivated women try to get rid of men they oppose? It's frightening that women don't see any or almost no punishment for basically ruining a man's honorable life and reputation. Apparently something happened to Ford but all her actions are more reflective of someone who was involved in a crime and wants to use this as an opportunity to get rid of someone she opposes politically. Why is a sexual incident among teens 36 years ago worse than what she might be doing today? All under the veil of womanhood/victim hood. I'm so sick and tired of this equality nonsense when women clearly wage a war against men and act in the most outrageous sexist ways. Not saying Ford is doing that. ..but the line of outrageous opportunists and sexists on the female side is incredibly long.

Anonymous said...

What if the roles were revered?
Imagine a female judge a lot of men are opposed against.. then one day some man comes forward and says he is a former highschool mate. and he alleges the female candidate did something 36 years ago and he was so troubled by it, he first wants the FBI to investigate (which makes no sense as after 36 years nothing can be done)... OF COURSE IT'S BS. OF COURSE NO ONE WOULD BELIEVE HIM. But, as it is a woman, we accept it. 36 years ago you say? Right on, I will put my magic FBI cap on and then find "evidence" beyond reasonable doubt. Are you kidding me?? She doesn't even testify. She gets to smear a family man's reputation and no consequences. Because equality. Yeah, right

Anonymous said...

"Not only do women like Dr. Ford who bravely comes forward need to be heard but they --need-- to be believed. (...) Guess who's doing all the crime in this country? --It's the men, not the women--. Just do the right thing for once and step up"

- Democrat Senator of Hawaii Mazie Hirono on the end of democracy and law and why women should rule this country

FFS

If a man would utter such words he would be fired and run out of office the same day, the same hour even. WTF

fred said...

slow down, cowboy: He said NO. She said Yes. finally, Congress agrees to get them to swear under oath. Every prosecutor consulted on tv about this said the FBI needs to do check on her story. You can get those who would have been present etc. Not to have FBI check is simply to say ok we believe him and not her. There is evidence now that he skirts the truth in his testimony thus far. There is clear evidence that the GOP will not release many of his records for public scrutiny. In so important an appointment, full investigation is required. Yes. It might take some time but that is better than ramming it through to get your person in place. In passing: not to have this investigated will cost the GOP many many votes in forthcoming elections, and that is what I am hearing from women.
Either she is a liar or he is. There is but one way to find out...and you would dismiss this?

fred said...

The FBI in this instance would be a Trump appointment. Sen Grassley has rejected the call for FBI investigation.
DR FORD'S LETTER TO THE COMMITTEE

Mike Feldhake said...

A made up story you all spent more time on again. Yes, it's headline media but there are much more important stories to talk about yet we choose these. Ugh, IQ's are shrinking!

fred said...

6 possible Kavanaugh scenarios, including a Supreme Court vacancy until 2021

Anonymous said...

The whole point is to make an allegation which is not disprovable. Since this woman cannot remember where, when, or exactly who was involved how can any of it be answered. It is open ended like this for maximum media/political time.

fred said...

Republicans just made a giant gamble on Brett Kavanaugh

Bob Huntley said...

Memory of painful experiences can be very intense. I remember when I was circumcised. I was only two days old. It hurt so much I couldn't walk for a year.

Anonymous said...

She said: I can not recall the party..He said: I was not at that party!


EXCLUSIVE: 'A school swimming in alcohol', beach parties, sex and even a STRIPPER - inside Brett Kavanaugh's elite education, by the friend accused of being part of 'drunken sex attack'

Brett Kavanaugh went to elite all-boys Catholic school Georgetown Prep in Bethesda, MD - and is now accused of attack on girl, 15, when he was there
Professor who claims Kavanaugh attacked her said that his best friend Mark Judge was also present and helped, jumping on top of her too
Christine Blasey Ford said it happened during drunken party when she was wearing bathing suit
Now DailyMail.com has obtained both books written by Judge which detail what he says were drink-sodden high school years
He writes about 'popping', the habit of holding parties when parents were away, which saw teenage sex and houses trashed
Writes about 'Bart O'Kavanaugh' who had 'puked' in a car and also writes about a bachelor party for teacher for which students hired a stripper
Kavanaugh now denies he was at the party where alleged attack took place and has told senators she must be mistaking him for someone else

AZuLike said...

FBI check is for a federal crime. There was no federal crime committed. Actually no crime was committed there no evidence of it. I think by today just a guess if she does not swear under oath and testify under congress this is done.

AZuLike said...

Also she was very liberal Ironic she scrubbed her twitter and facebook account before coming out hmmm seems fishy to me.

B.Poster said...

The notion that she would not be able to recall the full details of the incident while perhaps not impossible is highly improbable. For example, there is a mathematical chance that one could win the lottery seven times in one lifetime, just not a very good one. As such, her claims here should be dismissed out of hand. Like the editor, I know of no one who is a victim of such a crime that cannot recall full details.

It appears the idea is to make an allegation that the accused cannot disprove. The accused cannot disprove it therefore the accused stands guilty as charged. This has been the nature for this type of crime for sometime. We just generally have not been so public about it.

Now as to his testimony being truthful with regards to legal issues that can be proven or disproven based upon available evidence or which records to release are reasonable questions. This is where the focus should be. Unfortunately by giving credence to Ms. Ford this is just further evidence of what an unserious country we have become.

Anonymous said...

The President can order an FBI check if he wanted to. period. Vetting someone is routine.

Anonymous said...

who cares

AZuLike said...

Why would the president order a FBI check?

Anonymous said...

If Ford is innocent, why did she scrub her social media accounts?

Anonymous said...

Ford is just a dirty dog Democrat

She has marched in every Leftist protest march there was in California.

She is such a crazy Leftists woman that any American male would be better off marrying almost any woman from any country of child bearing sight unseen that to marry a whacked out Leftist like Ford.

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/dirty+dog

Anonymous said...

Lawyers will argue that witnesses cannot correctly recall an auto accident they say on the last week.

This is investigatable?


Puhhllleeeeeeaaase!

Bob Huntley said...

Anon

I see you tried to get back to me but as usual could not get your head straight.

You still haven't answered the two questions.

Why is that pipeline important to the USA?

Why is the USA not a member of the FCC?

They aren't difficult. Give them a try. You can do it son.

AZuLike said...

Did not know you could private message.. Learn something new every day haha.

Anonymous said...

Poor Bob with his wingnut conspiracy theories about how America is gaining from pipelines it does not own and receives no profit from.

Bob our very own Alex Jones of the Left

Anonymous said...

Bob, If you want to post about pipelines then post to the correct thread.

Put down the bottle Bob

Bob Huntley said...

Answer the questions turkey or are you afraid to show hop dumb you are?

AZuLike said...

Did Azino Smith go anon?

Anonymous said...

to show hop[sic] dumb you are?

The key for 'P' is nowhere near the key for 'w'

Put down the bottle Bob.

Bob Huntley said...


Anon

Your recent comment on the pipeline shows just how dumb you are. You can't answer the question can you?

How about the FCC. Once again your rant about the US not being a member was beyond dumb.

And by the way, you are the last person on Earth who should challenge someone on posting etiquette.

Beware turkey, thanksgiving is coming.

Anonymous said...

Bobbie Sue,

Now you are just posting word salad.

Bob Huntley said...

Anon

Little fellow, when it comes to posting word salad I can only look up at your shoelaces.

Have you been able to get any help answering the questions?

1. Why is the pipeline important to the US and I'll add to that who owns it, as long as it isn't Russia, is okay?

2. Can you explain why the US is not a member of the ICC? It is really, like really easy, even for a guy like you. Give it a try because you really need to overcome this one. Hint, same reason ISIS and Al Qaeda aren't members.