Friday, September 7, 2018

President Trump Threatens To Hit China With Another $267 Billion In Tariffs



CNBC: Trump says he's ready to hit China with another $267 billion in tariffs

* Traveling with reporters on Air Force One on Friday, President Trump said he could put tariffs on another $267 billion of Chinese goods "if he wants."
* Trump's remarks to reporters sparked a 100-point drop in the Dow Jones Industrial Average around 12 p.m. ET.

President Donald Trump told reporters on Air Force One Friday that he was "ready to go" on tariffs for another $267 billion in Chinese goods "if he wants," which would come on top of the $200 billion in goods already targeted, according to Bloomberg and Reuters.

Already the administration was set to announce it would impose the tariffs on the $200 billion in goods, after threatening them in an ongoing and escalating dispute with China. A public comment period on this set of tariffs expired Thursday in the U.S. China's commerce ministry has said the country would retaliate if the U.S. imposes new tariffs.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: These additional tariffs .... if implemented .... will essentially cover all Chinese imports. My prediction .... it is going to happen, especially in view of yesterday's trade deficit report .... $50 billion trade deficit for July (San Francisco Chronicle).

More News On President Trump Threatening To Hit China With Another $267 Billion In Tariffs

Trump: Ready to tax an additional $267B in Chinese imports -- AP
Trump ups ante on China, threatens duties on $267 billion more imports -- Reuters
Trump warns of tariffs on another $267 billion of Chinese imports -- CNN

10 comments:

Matthew Putnam said...

The only reason China has become such a significant military and economic threat to the West recently is because of the unfettered trade relationship China has had with us up until now, along with the lack of a crackdown on their incredible intellectual property theft. China is going to continue to be a significant problem on many levels, so disempowering them in the trade arena is essential in the short and long term future. The best thing we can do is to begin taking our current economic activities to the other SE Asian countries that are currently being threatened by China, and empower them as a counter to Chinese power in the region so that they can deter China in the coming years. China is a communist state that now has a life-term communist leader who's legitimacy comes from all the rewards of its capitalist hybrid command economy model. If this plug is removed then China's bellicose activities will be mostly focused inward on preservation of the state, and will become less of an issue for everyone that its current course toward regional hegemon.

fred said...


US Businesses Warn "Reckoning Is Coming" If Trump Moves Ahead With $200BN China Tariffs

Anonymous said...

Mexico with new trade deal in place should be licking its chops right now!

Anonymous said...

These actions would have been unthinkable to Obama or Bush. Wouldn't want Chancellor Merkel disapproval. Wouldn't want the tech-finance-Goldman Sachs future employers pissed off. The only reason Trump can get away with this is because he isn't in the pocket of those economic predators in the USA. All of them beneficiaries of low cost HIB visas to pump up profits and deflate wages. Bernie Sanders knows it too and that Hillary was bought and owned by the tech-finance-Goldman Sachs predators.

I hope Trump stays engaged, gets a bigger House and Senate GOP majorities and fights China's depredations for the next 6 years.

Anonymous said...

https://deadline.com/2018/09/eagles-nfl-kickoff-game-ratings-down-falcons-nbc-1202459228/

Anonymous said...

Zerohedge articles are hit & miss.

China has cheated in trade before.

China has cheated on IP.

Larry Kudlow is still with Trump. I would not expect neolib Fred to know of Kudlow or how much conservatives love him.

So the ZH article is not much.

fred said...

Try saying something without chilish insults

Anonymous said...

Fredacus...

Anonymous said...

Fred,

I posted at 4:08.

there is not an insult in there unless you consider showing you up an insult.

I am sorry but there "ain't" no cure for that.

Please inform us what is a childish or "chilish" insult.

Matthew Putnam said...

More cunt froth by Fred. Close your legs and sit down.